On Sun, 14 May 2017 06:58:01 +0200
Vincent Torri <vincent.to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Try to fix it. Add elm functions which are needed, at least for X and
> if you can, for Wayland.

That is funny! Spend my time fixing an issue other have ignored for
years. Despite that I cannot run Wayland. Those that do are not seeking
to further EFL in needed ways such as addressing the above. Yet they
make it the responsibility of people looking to develop applications to
do such. That seems a bit off and funny!

It is not my fault code exists in ecore x, that may not in wayland,
win32, etc. That the abstracted layer elm_cnp, does not support the
coded stuff in ecore x, much less adding the same to others. This seems
like quite a bit of work and not trivial in nature. Which is likely why
it was never done.

Bit ironic to give someone grief then expect them to do work in an area
others have not. That is not a good way to motivate someone....

-- 
William L. Thomson Jr.

Attachment: pgplZbQ1XHjU3.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to