>>Frederico Samarane wrote:
>> Hi Pierre, I use the 200 2.8 L. It have one great balance
>> costXbenefice, use 72 filter too. You can use it with 1.4X
>> and 2X with out great lost of quality. Add one 20 2.8 (that
>> is my case) and you cover one good rage from 20 to 200 with
>> the same filter size.
"Pierre Bellavance" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I now hesitate between the 200 f/4L and the 300mm IS f/4L. I
> like IS very much on my 28-135 lens. ...
Hi Pierre,
The EF 200mm is an f/2.8 lens. There is no current image
stabilizer version.
If you have many 72mm filters shared with the EF 28-135 IS USM,
it may be possible to use step-up or even step-down filter adapter
rings. For instance, although my EF 100-400 L IS USM has a 77mm
filter mount, the front element is only 67mm in size, so 72mm
filters work fine with a 77-to-72mm adapter ring. And I get
Image stabilization too :-)
I cannot comment about filters for the EF 300mm f/4 L IS.
Cheers
Julian Loke
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
