>> Julian Loke wrote:
>> Don't forget the EF 75-300 IS USM, which was the first EF lens
>> with an Image Stabilizer function...
"Pierre Bellavance" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's the long end of the lens (from 200 to 300) that interests me
> (because I already have the 28-135), and I've read that it's not where
> the 75-300 shines.
Hi Pierre,
If image quality is so important to you, then using a Teleconverter
on your EF 28-135 is not a good idea. If you want f/16 on a tripod,
the Image Stabilizer is not tripod capable on the 28-135, 75-300,
300 f/4 and 100-400. http://www.photozone.de/canonFAQ.htm#3Q6e
Cheers
Julian Loke
P.S. Here are the links to FAQs about long lens choices:
http://bobatkins.photo.net/info/faq30/telefoto.htm
http://www.photozone.de/canonFAQ.htm#75vs100
http://www.photozone.de/canonFAQ.htm#long
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
