On Dec 3, 12:34 pm, Enrique Fynn <enriquef...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ha... So you are judging the people who do theoretical physics,
Yes. > you > say that they are not as good as engineers as scientists, No. You incorrectly used a bare plural. Bare plural usage was the subject of all papers provided in the first post and you failed to read or understand what was right under your nose. This is one more stupid mistake to add to a list of many that you made. > Ok... my > mistake, but your argument still is the same, and now I don't > understand why you say that in the first place, you are judging the > people not the subjects, > and that is pointless and irrelevant to this > list. > All people with your recent history of many stupid mistakes should voluntarily refrain from expressing any opinions in the near future. (note the absence of any bare plurals) > Regards; > Fynn. > -- > "Even a stopped clock is right twice a day" > > "When I feed the poor, they call me a saint, but when I ask why the > poor are hungry, they call me a communist." > _ Dom Helder Camara > > 2010/12/2 aruzinsky <aruzin...@general-cathexis.com>: > > > > > LIAR! LIAR! LIAR! LIAR! LIAR! LIAR! LIAR! LIAR! LIAR! LIAR! LIAR! > > LIAR! LIAR! LIAR! > > > You are an immoral liar of the highest degree because you do it for > > the pettiest of reasons. > > > You falsely said, 'now in your words "theoretical physics is not AS > > science as engineering, they are NOT AS GOOD... " .' > > > I NEVER SAID THAT. I said, > > > 1. "In some important sense, but, not every sense, theoretical > > physicists are not as good as engineers." . > > > 2. "Engineering is a sort of science, as a matter of degree, it is > > more science than most "science" because it has more empirical > > validation." > > > To all other observers, if you use your browser's search function, you > > can easily verify that the only person to previously say "theoretical > > physics" in this thread is Enrique Fynn. > > > On Dec 1, 1:00 pm, Enrique Fynn <enriquef...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Just because is not affecting your life, that doesn't mean it is not > >> science, but now in your words "theoretical physics is not AS science > >> as engineering, they are NOT AS GOOD... (the bullshit continues > >> (...))" > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Epistemology" group. > > To post to this group, send email to epistemol...@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to epistemol...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
