Need a hand climbing out of that deep hole you've been hiding in Nom!

On 2 Dec, 19:07, Craig Weinberg <whatsons...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Nah, the neutrino announcement was premature in 2011.
>
> CERN Confirms Neutrinos Not Faster Than Light
> June 11, 2012
>
> http://www.redorbit.com/news/science/1112551696/cern-confirms-neutrin...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sunday, December 2, 2012 1:59:07 PM UTC-5, nominal9 wrote:
>
> > Sorry for the link, Archytas.... it works for me.....I'll repost it if you
> > are really interested in going to it... but it is probably nothing that you
> > don't already know... Me on the other hand....I found it eye-opening... the
> > analogy is to something I never thought of.... the "string" apparently is
> > an analogy to a guitar (or piano) string where different tensions give rise
> > to different "sounds"... frequencies and all that.... I always thought the
> > analogy referred to some floppy line of particle thingies... a limp noodle
> > like a piece of spaghetti.... HAR...
>
> >http://www.superstringtheory.com/basics/index.html
>
> > anyway... I heard a while back that some Phycisists.... I believe it was
> > Italians... had found some  neutrino
> > thing".... that travelled at a speed faster than light... I haven't heard
> > any follow-up to the story... have you?
> > If it proves at least possible.... what does that do for Einstein's
> > theory?  That reminds me of that "cold-fusion reaction" claim that came
> > up... anyway... I also referenced an answer to my question from another
> > lab.... which I also posted....Now, all there needs to be is a third
> > test... or more.... from maybe the Large Hadron?
> > I may not "get" the math.... but I sure do like to notice the test
> > results....
>
> >http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2011/sep/22/faster-than-light-parti...
>
> >  Faster than light particles found, claim scientists
>
> > Particle physicists detect neutrinos travelling faster than light, a feat
> > forbidden by Einstein's theory of special relativity
>
> >    -   Share
> >    
> > <http://www.facebook.com/dialog/feed?app_id=180444840287&link=http://w...>
> >    19782
> >    -
> >    -
> >    - inShare146
> >    - 
> > Email<http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2011/sep/22/faster-than-light-parti...>
>
> >    -  Ian Sample <http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/iansample>, science
> >    correspondent
> >    - The Guardian <http://www.guardian.co.uk/theguardian>, Thursday 22
> >    September 2011 18.32 EDT
> >    - Jump to comments 
> > (619)<http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2011/sep/22/faster-than-light-parti...>
>
> >  [image: Subatomic Neutrino Tracks]
> > Neutrinos, like the ones above, have been detected travelling faster than
> > light, say particle physicists. Photograph: Dan Mccoy /Corbis
>
> > It is a concept that forms a cornerstone of our understanding of the
> > universe and the concept of time – nothing can travel faster than the speed
> > of light.
>
> > But now it seems that researchers working in one of the world's largest
> > physics <http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/physics> laboratories, under a
> > mountain in central Italy, have recorded particles travelling at a speed
> > that is supposedly forbidden by Einstein's theory of special relativity.
>
> > Scientists at the Gran Sasso facility will unveil evidence on Friday that
> > raises the troubling possibility of a way to send information back in time,
> > blurring the line between past and present and wreaking havoc with the
> > fundamental principle of cause and effect.
>
> > They will announce the result at a special seminar at 
> > Cern<http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/cern>– the European particle
> > physics <http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/particlephysics> laboratory –
> > timed to coincide with the publication of a research 
> > paper<http://arxiv.org/abs/1109.4897>(
> > pdf <http://arxiv.org/pdf/1109.4897v1>) describing the experiment.
>
> > Researchers on the Opera (Oscillation Project with Emulsion-tRacking
> > Apparatus) experiment recorded the arrival times of ghostly subatomic
> > particles called neutrinos sent from Cern on a 730km journey through the
> > Earth to the Gran Sasso lab.
>
> > The trip would take a beam of light 2.4 milliseconds to complete, but
> > after running the experiment for three years and timing the arrival of
> > 15,000 neutrinos, the scientists discovered that the particles arrived at
> > Gran Sasso sixty billionths of a second earlier, with an error margin of
> > plus or minus 10 billionths of a second.
>
> > The measurement amounts to the neutrinos travelling faster than the speed
> > of light by a fraction of 20 parts per million. Since the speed of light is
> > 299,792,458 metres per second, the neutrinos were evidently travelling at
> > 299,798,454 metres per second.
>
> > The result is so unlikely that even the research team is being cautious
> > with its interpretation. Physicists said they would be sceptical of the
> > finding until other laboratories confirmed the result.
>
> > Antonio Ereditato, coordinator of the Opera collaboration, told the
> > Guardian: "We are very much astonished by this result, but a result is
> > never a discovery until other people confirm it.
>
> > "When you get such a result you want to make sure you made no mistakes,
> > that there are no nasty things going on you didn't think of. We spent
> > months and months doing checks and we have not been able to find any errors.
>
> > "If there is a problem, it must be a tough, nasty effect, because trivial
> > things we are clever enough to rule out."
>
> > The Opera group said it hoped the physics community would scrutinise the
> > result and help uncover any flaws in the measurement, or verify it with
> > their own experiments.
>
> > Subir Sarkar, head of particle theory at Oxford University, said: "If this
> > is proved to be true it would be a massive, massive event. It is something
> > nobody was expecting.
>
> > "The constancy of the speed of light essentially underpins our
> > understanding of space and time and causality, which is the fact that cause
> > comes before effect."
>
> > The key point underlying causality is that the laws of physics as we know
> > them dictate that information cannot be communicated faster than the speed
> > of light in a vacuum, added Sarkar.
>
> > "Cause cannot come after effect and that is absolutely fundamental to our
> > construction of the physical universe. If we do not have causality, we are
> > buggered."
>
> > The Opera experiment detects neutrinos as they strike 150,000 "bricks" of
> > photographic emulsion films interleaved with lead plates. The detector
> > weighs a total of 1300 tonnes.
>
> > Despite the marginal increase on the speed of light observed by
> > Ereditato's team, the result is intriguing because its statistical
> > significance, the measure by which particle physics discoveries stand and
> > fall, is so strong.
>
> > Physicists can claim a discovery if the chances of their result being a
> > fluke of statistics are greater than five standard deviations, or less than
> > one in a few million. The Gran Sasso team's result is six standard
> > deviations.
>
> > Ereditato said the team would not claim a discovery because the result was
> > so radical. "Whenever you touch something so fundamental, you have to be
> > much more prudent," he said.
>
> > Alan Kostelecky, an expert in the possibility of faster-than-light
> > processes at Indiana University, said that while physicists would await
> > confirmation of the result, it was none the less exciting.
>
> > "It's such a dramatic result it would be difficult to accept without
> > others replicating it, but there will be enormous interest in this," he
> > told the Guardian.
>
> > One theory Kostelecky and his colleagues put forward in 1985 predicted
> > that neutrinos could travel faster than the speed of light by interacting
> > with an unknown field that lurks in the vacuum.
>
> > "With this kind of background, it is not necessarily the case that the
> > limiting speed in nature is the speed of light," he said. "It might
> > actually be the speed of neutrinos and light goes more slowly."
>
> > Neutrinos are mysterious particles. They have a minuscule mass, no
> > electric charge, and pass through almost any material as though it was not
> > there.
>
> > Kostelecky said that if the result was verified – a big if – it might pave
> > the way to a grand theory that marries gravity with quantum mechanics, a
> > puzzle that has defied physicists for nearly a century.
>
> > "If this is confirmed, this is the first evidence for a crack in the
> > structure of physics as we know it that could provide a clue to
> > constructing such a unified theory," Kostelecky said.
>
> > Heinrich Paes, a physicist at Dortmund University, has developed another
> > theory that could explain the result. The neutrinos may be taking a
> > shortcut through space-time, by travelling from Cern to Gran Sasso through
> > extra dimensions. "That can make it look like a particle has gone faster
> > than the speed of light when it hasn't," he said.
>
> > But Susan Cartwright, senior lecturer in particle astrophysics at
> > Sheffield University, said: "Neutrino experimental results are not
> > historically all that reliable, so the words 'don't hold your breath' do
> > spring to mind when you hear very counter-intuitive results like this."
>
> > Teams at two experiments known as T2K in Japan and MINOS near Chicago in
> > the US will now attempt to replicate the finding. The MINOS experiment saw
> > hints of neutrinos moving at faster than the speed of light in 2007 but has
> > yet to confirm them.
>
> > • This article was amended on 23 September 2011 to clarify the relevance
> > of the speed of light to causality.
>
> >http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/20/us-science-neutrinos-idUSTR...
>
> ...
>
> read more »

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Epistemology" group.
To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.

Reply via email to