Okay...... now what's the next step.......?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/15/science/physicists-see-higgs-boson-in-new-particle-but-more-study-is-needed.html?_r=0
By DENNIS 
OVERBYE<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/o/dennis_overbye/index.html>
 Published: 
March 14, 2013 

   - Facebook
   - Twitter
   - Google+
   - Save
   - E-mail
   - Share
   - 
Print<http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/15/science/physicists-see-higgs-boson-in-new-particle-but-more-study-is-needed.html?_r=0&pagewanted=print>
   - Reprints
   -  
   
<http://www.nytimes.com/adx/bin/adx_click.html?type=goto&opzn&page=www.nytimes.com/yr/mo/day&pos=Frame4A&sn2=72270860/53be7632&sn1=b5f6b105/c2fff475&camp=FSL2013_ArticleTools_120x60_1849315b_nyt5&ad=Stoker_NYT120x60_NowPlaying_March1&goto=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Efoxsearchlight%2Ecom%2Fstoker>

  Physicists at 
CERN<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/c/cern/index.html?inline=nyt-org>,
 
the European Organization for Nuclear Research, said Thursday that the new 
particle discovered with enormous fanfare last summer definitely looks like 
a Higgs 
boson<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/h/higgs_boson/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier>,
 
the particle famously predicted by Peter Higgs and others to imbue 
elementary particles with mass. But they said they still needed more data 
to understand how it works and what it means for the universe. 
   Special Section 
 
<http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/05/science/chasing-the-higgs-boson-how-2-teams-of-rivals-at-CERN-searched-for-physics-most-elusive-particle.html>
Chasing the 
Higgs<http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/05/science/chasing-the-higgs-boson-how-2-teams-of-rivals-at-CERN-searched-for-physics-most-elusive-particle.html>
 

How two armies of scientists closed in on physics’ most elusive particle.

   - Video: Collision 
Course<http://www.nytimes.com/video/2013/03/04/science/100000002094542/higgs-boson-a-cern-collision-course.html>
   - Timeline: Higgs, From Theory to 
Reality<http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2013/03/05/science/higgs-boson-timeline.html>

  [image: Science Twitter Logo.] <http://twitter.com/#%21/nytimesscience>
Connect With Us on Social Media <http://twitter.com/#%21/nytimesscience> 

@nytimesscience <http://twitter.com/#%21/nytimesscience> on Twitter. 

   - Science Reporters and Editors on 
Twitter<https://twitter.com/nytimesscience/sci-times-reporters-eds/members>

Like the science desk on Facebook. <http://www.facebook.com/nytimesscience>
  
“The preliminary results with the full 2012 data set are magnificent,” Joe 
Incandela, a professor at the University of California, Santa 
Barbara<http://topics.nytimes.com/topics/reference/timestopics/organizations/u/university_of_california/index.html?inline=nyt-org>,
 
and leader of one of the discovery teams, said in a statement released by 
CERN. “To me it is clear that we are dealing with a Higgs boson, though we 
still have a long way to go to know what kind of Higgs boson it is.” 

After rummaging through the data from some 2,000 trillion collisions of 
subatomic particles in the Large Hadron 
Collider<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/science/topics/large_hadron_collider/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier>—
 more than twice as much data as led to the original discovery — 
physicists meeting at a workshop in La Thuile, 
Italy<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/italy/index.html?inline=nyt-geo>,
 
said that they still did not know if there was only one Higgs boson, as 
predicted by the Standard Model, the reigning theory in physics, or if the 
new particle was only the lightest of a whole set of Higgs bosons, a 
circumstance envisioned by some more advanced and speculative theories. 

The verdict will hinge on more detailed measurements of the particle’s 
properties, like its spin and how it decays relative to other particles. 
The Higgs boson is supposed to have no spin at all; it is the knuckleball 
of the subatomic world. 

CERN’s collider, just outside Geneva, is now down for two years of repairs, 
but its teams have stockpiled their unanalyzed data, and look forward to 
the prospect of more years of high-energy collisions starting in 2015. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Epistemology" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to