Thanks On May 24, 2014 6:20 PM, "archytas" <nwte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Popper was into it in a theory of probability. Vast literature ranges > across even to godswank. Summary here with a fair bibliography - > http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qt-consciousness/ > > On Friday, 29 November 2013 07:45:09 UTC, Awori wrote: >> >> Has anybody ever authored a book or paper on the philosophy of quantum >> behaviour? >> On Nov 28, 2013 1:43 PM, "socratus sadovnik" <isoc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Quantum Evolution: How Physics . . . >>>> >>>> / by Johnjoe McFadden / >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *http://www.amazon.com/Quantum-Evolution-Weirdest-Explains-Paperback/product-reviews/0393323102/ref=dp_top_cm_cr_acr_txt?showViewpoints=1*<http://www.amazon.com/Quantum-Evolution-Weirdest-Explains-Paperback/product-reviews/0393323102/ref=dp_top_cm_cr_acr_txt?showViewpoints=1> >>>> >>>> # >>>> >>>> *Customer Review* >>>> >>>> # >>>> >>>> You've probably noticed that there is a growing flood of books that >>>> purport to explore the interface between the spooky scientific world of >>>> quantum physics and a range of other aspects of existence? >>>> >>>> . . . . >>>> >>>> Many in the sciences don't seem to know what to do with the quantum >>>> world. The physicists seem to wobble in their ability to create rich models >>>> at any level above that of the quantum phenomena themselves - perhaps >>>> because theirs can be a sparse world... the vast emptiness beyond the >>>> quark. They are often only comfortable "wrapping" the ultimately >>>> incomprehensible realities of the quantum world in merely mathematical or >>>> semantic models. >>>> >>>> By Daryl Anderson >>>> >>>> # >>>> >>>> Overall the first part of the book is great in understanding that a >>>> paradigm shift must be made if the evolutionary hypothesis is to remain >>>> salient. If these shifts are not adopted we may see the Darwinian >>>> evolutionist go down in history as ideological frauds much like the >>>> flat-earthers. The second part of the book is lacking due to a >>>> misunderstanding of Quantum Mechanics and trying to force science to fit a >>>> philosophical ideology. >>>> >>>> By Enigma "Cheers"" >>>> >>>> ===… >>>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Epistemology" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to epistemology...@googlegroups.com. >>> To post to this group, send email to episte...@googlegroups.com. >>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Epistemology" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
