A good read, will respond.
On May 23, 2014 5:30 PM, "archytas" <nwte...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I find the drive for explanation odd, though by no means unwelcome.  The
> general human world seems almost entirely mad, little better than the
> world-views anthropology reveals, despite our science.  Physics has its
> fossil record, with most of what we live in locally down to a couple of
> quarks and the electron.  The digging is rather more complex than that of
> the archaeologist with her spade and brush.  Biological intelligence may
> well produce little more than Nominal's greenhouse gas and biological
> evolution itself, seen from the future, may be little more than a small
> phase.  The thought of humans flying through space playing out current soap
> opera fills me with dread, the lack of consideration of pleasure with Data
> or Seven-of-Nine appalling.
>
> We already have the concept of ourselves as hapless vessels of the
> gene-machine, and know of such as the sperm wars and our existence in a
> co-evolutionary arms' race.  That we might be a transitory tool in a
> universe developing for its own 'purposes' might be a better vision than
> the Attic tragedies of literature.  The bleak current is our powerlessness
> in some economic system that burns and poisons the planet we need to
> survive and in which we vote for various mad-to-be despots leading us on
> the charge to the centre of this volcano.  Let's face it, we humans are
> unlikely to survive each other.  Currently, we would have to leave this
> planet through space hostile to biology reliant on gravity, needing
> protection from space weather, in the hope of a planet not with
> micro-organisms 'waiting to eat us'.  Even there, we would still be in a
> universe expanding to 'photon heat death' and have to set ourselves to
> moving to another one.
>
> Could there be another evolution going on that might assimilate us to an
> actual intelligent form, capable of a very different relation in what we
> currently describe as a particle field, or various addresses in space-time?
>  Biology has long considered an information world, but we seem to have
> little idea of what we might be other than as Nominal's fart-producers in
> 'essence'.  What is Socratus' Planck-small in our gravity-focused address?
>
> On Wednesday, 4 December 2013 18:55:24 UTC, nominal9 wrote:
>>
>> Like I said elsewhere... ESSENCE... BAD WORD.... I think "essence" is
>> "stinky" word....like "essence" meaning odor that comes from "Anus"....that
>> is about all that the "notion of Essence" is worth... Phenomenological
>> Superstition......waste of your time, Socratus, ....in my opinion...
>>
>> On Saturday, November 30, 2013 12:24:15 AM UTC-5, socratus sadovnik wrote:
>>>
>>>  What/where  is the essence of quantum  evolutionary theory ?
>>>>
>>>> In my opinion the essence is hidden in
>>>>
>>>>  * The theory of Quantum Electrodynamics*.
>>>>
>>>> As the QED is studied interaction between energy
>>>>
>>>> (photon/electron) with matter so it needed to pay attention
>>>>
>>>>  on these two parallel ways of quantum evolution.
>>>>
>>>> ==..
>>>>
>>>> *The classical  physicist  (biophysicist) *  must all time keep
>>>>
>>>>  in the mind  the Planck's constant  because the life /evolution
>>>>
>>>>  begins on the quantum level:  h , h*=h/2pi ,  QED.
>>>>
>>>> ==..
>>>>
>>>> socratus
>>>>
>>>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Epistemology" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Epistemology" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to