Conversion to a “D” requires the plane meet the 787 type certificate.  787
was certified under a different set of rules than 718 and the fire
protection requirements differ slightly.  Since this part does not in any
way affect the flight characteristics, and since the STC does not remove the
plane from TCDS 718, the stainless skin is not required.

 

John Cooper, A&P

Skyport Services

PO Box 249

4996 Delaware Tnpk

Rensselaerville, NY 12147

518 797-3064

Fax 518 797-3865

www.skyportservices.net 

  _____  

From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Roy Stubbs
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 2:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; mbpowell; [email protected]
Subject: RE: {POSSIBLE_SPAM}: [PHI] RE: [ercoupe-tech] LSA Weight increase
STC

 

So years ago I considered changing my C to a D.  Boy, now I’m glad I did
not!

 

But there is at least one significant modification required to change from C
to D that surely is not part of the 1320# STC, and that is the requirement
to replace to skin over the center tank with stainless steel.  It is part of
the Univair mod kit.

 

Roy

 

 

  _____  

From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ed Burkhead
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 12:33 PM
To: mbpowell; [email protected]
Subject: {POSSIBLE_SPAM}: [PHI] RE: [ercoupe-tech] LSA Weight increase STC
Importance: Low

 


Mike,

May I answer from the perspective of having flown around 800 hours in that
configuration, much of it at a gross weight of very near 1320 lb., some of
it at higher gross weights.

1. As I understand it, the STC requires that the same changes be made in
the plane AS IF you were converting it to be a D model (though you are NOT
converting it really to be a D).

2a. This includes changing the up elevator restriction from 13° up travel to
9° up travel. This elevator restriction changes the touchdown speed from
the close ballpark of 50mph to the close ballpark of 55mph. YMMV.

2b. Side comment: If the runway is long enough, you can still land with
touchdown at 50 mph by having the engine about 200 rpm above idle as you
hold it off, hold it off, hold it off in the flare about 1-3 feet high and
hold the nose about even with the far end landing lights. This slows down
the sink rate, the air over the tail lets the tail push down farther getting
you to a higher angle of attack and slower airspeed (50 mph) and almost
guarantees a perfect squeak-squeak landing and compliments. It's the same
technique used for night landings when you aren't absolutely sure just how
far down it is to the runway. It's very gentle on the plane AS LONG AS YOU
HAVE ENOUGH RUNWAY.

3. If you were really foolish, foolish enough to be 50' high with the nose
pointed way down, that elevator restriction might make a difference in
hitting nose first rather than pancaking onto the runway level. I don't
recommend either. Fly the plane like you would any other plane, with normal
airspeed cushion, and it lands just fine. I NEVER came anywhere close to
such a situation in the hundreds of landings I made in this configuration.

4. On takeoff, you have a bit less up elevator authority to get you off of
a very short or very soft field. But that only matters to get you off the
ground, in my analysis. I don't think it'd make any big difference in your
climb over a 50' obstacle. That's because, with the engine at full power,
there's plenty of air over the 9° elevator to push the tail down and obtain
the best angle of climb airspeed. More elevator would only push you BELOW
the best angle of climb airspeed and thereby reduce your climb.

5. The structure of the plane is fundamentally the same whether you have
the C, CD, D, E, G and even with the 1450 lb. gross weight Forney F-1A, Alon
and Mooney models. The structural strength is not a problem at all.

6. To handle the heavier gross weights on landing, the increased gross
weight STC (just like the change to model D) requires the earlier model
Coupes to make some small modifications to the landing gear, changing
orifice sizes in the shock and such, if I remember correctly.

Summary: DO IT! It's a good change to get the increased gross weight.
This is what's necessary to do it legally. (There are those who say these
changes are not needed for safety and I won't argue with them but flying
over legal gross can be bad for your ticket and insurance coverage.)

JMHO.

Ed

Ed Burkhead
http://edburkhead. <http://edburkhead.com> com East Peoria, Illinois
ed -at- edburkhead???.com (change -at- to @ and remove "???")

 

Reply via email to