On Jan 8, 2012, at 4:53 PM, Mark S. Miller wrote: > On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Brendan Eich <bren...@mozilla.com> wrote: > [...] > > All cool with the above. Thanks. > > I wrote in a previous reply that we aren't preserving ES5 as a spec > referenced from ES6. ES6 will be self-contained. So I still don't grok your > concern here. > > Sorry, I missed that. In that case, I still don't understand what your plan > for ES6 is. Does the ES6 spec include the state machine and an updated form > of the ES5-non-strict portions of the ES5 spec, as referenced by that state > machine?
I defer to Allen, but one approach is to leave ES5-nonstrict as is, and combine strict and extended modes for the "6" in 5&6 and ES56. As you proposed! HTH, /be > If not, what standards document governs how a future standards compliant > browser is supposed to handle code which has non opted into anything, neither > implicitly-explicitly nor explicitly? > > > > -- > Cheers, > --MarkM
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
