As stated even more strongly in ECMA-404: > > Because it is so simple, it is not expected that the JSON grammar will > ever change. This gives JSON, as a foundational notation, tremendous > stability.
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 9:43 AM Jordan Harband <ljh...@gmail.com> wrote: > That's a ridiculous claim, considering JSON has never supported functions, > or `undefined`, or RegExps, or Dates. > > ES6 also introduced `Symbol`, `Map`, `Set`, etc all of which have no JSON > representation. > > There's no "limbo" - JSON is, and will forever be, a subset of JS. Many > new things will be added to JS, and *none* of them will likely ever be > added to JSON at this point. > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 9:23 AM, Anders Rundgren < > anders.rundgren....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 2018-07-26 17:24, Ranando King wrote: >> >>> JSON = JavaScript Object Notation >>> >> >> This obviously broke down when tc39 introduced BigInt leaving the JSON/JS >> community in limbo. >> >> Anders >> >> _______________________________________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> es-discuss@mozilla.org >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >> > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
