Irrelevant until a person can actually purchase one.

Till then it's pie in the sky.



________________________________
 From: Peri Hartman via EV <ev@lists.evdl.org>
To: Electric Vehicle Discussion List <ev@lists.evdl.org> 
Sent: Friday, March 6, 2015 11:07 AM
Subject: Re: [EVDL] EVLN: BASF sez 1k+mi NiMH EV Pack> 700Wh/kg,        
lighter-weight
 

Yep, pretty much agree with you.  The details will probably come down to 
the amount of time to recharge.  If you can travel for 4 hours and 
recharge in 10-15 minutes, I think it will be scarce to find 
discontented people.   4 hours at 65mph would be 260 mile range.  Of 
course, unless you regularly make trips longer than 4 hours, taking a 
bit longer to charge "shouldn't" be such a big deal :)  I think it's 
excitinig that we're getting close to 200 mile range cars at a LEAF 
price.

Peri

------ Original Message ------
From: "Ben Goren via EV" <ev@lists.evdl.org>
To: "brucedp5" <bruce...@operamail.com>; "Electric Vehicle Discussion 
List" <ev@lists.evdl.org>
Sent: 06-Mar-15 8:59:29 AM
Subject: Re: [EVDL] EVLN: BASF sez 1k+mi NiMH EV Pack> 700Wh/kg, 
lighter-weight

>On Mar 6, 2015, at 2:19 AM, brucedp5 via EV <ev@lists.evdl.org> wrote:
>
>>  [T]he kind of developments being researched by BASF could very well 
>>pave the way to cars that could travel more than 1,000 miles on a 
>>battery pack the same size as the ones in today’s mid-priced electric 
>>cars.
>
>I'm sure we'll never see significant numbers of thousand-mile-range 
>cars on the market. That's almost twelve hours at 85 MPH, and over 
>eighteen hours at 55 MPH.
>
>What we'd see long before then would be cars with half as much battery. 
>Never mind the savings in money; the space and weight could be put to 
>better use.
>
>Or, if a battery of that much capacity winds up in a vehicle, the 
>vehicle will be something like the Hummer: hugely oversized and 
>inefficient, but still with a 500-mile range due to twice the 
>batteries.
>
>It looks like a 200-mile range seems to be the point where "Joe 
>Sixpack" stops having crippling amounts of range anxiety (whether 
>justified or not), and we're transitioning to that being not untypical. 
>Tesla's had that for a while and all the rumors are about the next 
>vehicles from various major manufacturers meeting that spec.
>
>I'd expect most cars to eventually settle on a 250 - 350 mile range, no 
>matter what happens to battery capacity. There might be some premium 
>models with a 500+ mile range for bragging / non-stop cross-country 
>touring (65 MPH * 8 hours = 520 miles), but never a 1000 mile range.
>
>b&
>-------------- next part --------------
>A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>Name: signature.asc
>Type: application/pgp-signature
>Size: 801 bytes
>Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
>URL: 
><http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20150306/7fb6c0d0/attachment.pgp>
>_______________________________________________
>UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
>http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
>For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
>(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



>
>

_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20150306/fed9be0b/attachment.htm>
_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

Reply via email to