2012/2/14 Stephen P. King <stephe...@charter.net> > On 2/14/2012 10:36 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote: > > >> The flaw is the entire structure of UDA+MGA, it assumes the existence >> of the very thing that is claims cannot exist. It is a theory that predicts >> that it cannot exist. How? By supposedly proving that the physical world >> does not exist. >> > > It does not prove that the physical world does not exist... it proves that > a *primitive* material world is irrelevant to predict your next moment, the > current physics of the world. Whether there is a primitive material world > or not cannot change your expectation of your next moment, rendering this > primitive material world devoid of explanatory power. > > HI Quentin, > > What is the difference? Please see my last post to ACW with the > subject header "Re: On Pre-existing Fields" > > The difference is that it is not primary... the physical universe emerge from computations. It should be an invariant in relative deep computation giving rise to consciousness.
Numbers->Computations->consciousness & universe > Onward! > > Stephen > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. > -- All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
