On 2/14/2012 2:38 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2012/2/14 Stephen P. King <stephe...@charter.net
<mailto:stephe...@charter.net>>
On 2/14/2012 10:36 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
The flaw is the entire structure of UDA+MGA, it assumes
the existence of the very thing that is claims cannot exist.
It is a theory that predicts that it cannot exist. How? By
supposedly proving that the physical world does not exist.
It does not prove that the physical world does not exist... it
proves that a *primitive* material world is irrelevant to predict
your next moment, the current physics of the world. Whether there
is a primitive material world or not cannot change your
expectation of your next moment, rendering this primitive
material world devoid of explanatory power.
HI Quentin,
What is the difference? Please see my last post to ACW with
the subject header "Re: On Pre-existing Fields"
The difference is that it is not primary... the physical universe
emerge from computations. It should be an invariant in relative deep
computation giving rise to consciousness.
Numbers->Computations->consciousness & universe
Hi Quentin,
No, numbers cannot have definite properties absent consciousness,
therefore one cannot derive consciousness from mere numbers.
A more correct diagram would be:
Numbers -> Computations
^ |
| v
Consciousness <- universes
Onward!
Stephen
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
