On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Stephen P. King <stephe...@charter.net> wrote: > On 1/5/2013 2:54 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote: >>> >>> yes, this does straight to the mind-body problem. I am proposing a >>> >solution to it that is different from Bruno's (and can subsume Bruno's >>> >idea), it is dual aspect monism. Minds and bodies are two distinct >>> > aspects >>> >of one and the same neutral oneness of all that exists. Vaughan Pratt >>> >explains this in his paper:http://boole.stanford.edu/pub/ratmech.pdf >>> > >>> >-- >>> >Onward! >>> > >>> >Stephen >>> > >> >> On reading Pratt it appears that he elevates mind/body duality to a TOE. >> But I have not read in sufficient depth, assuming that is possible for >> me, to know if that is true. >> Richard >> > Hi Richard, > > Yes, he is advancing a particular vision, but I would not call this > piece a TOE, it is part of a TOE that he advocates. > > > > -- > Onward! > > Stephen >
It Pratt's mind/body duality mechanism an alternative to mind/body coupling via BECs? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
