On 1/5/2013 9:03 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Stephen P. King <stephe...@charter.net> wrote:
On 1/5/2013 2:54 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
yes, this does straight to the mind-body problem. I am proposing a
solution to it that is different from Bruno's (and can subsume Bruno's
idea), it is dual aspect monism. Minds and bodies are two distinct
aspects
of one and the same neutral oneness of all that exists. Vaughan Pratt
explains this in his paper:http://boole.stanford.edu/pub/ratmech.pdf
--
Onward!
Stephen
On reading Pratt it appears that he elevates mind/body duality to a TOE.
But I have not read in sufficient depth, assuming that is possible for
me, to know if that is true.
Richard
Hi Richard,
Yes, he is advancing a particular vision, but I would not call this
piece a TOE, it is part of a TOE that he advocates.
--
Onward!
Stephen
It Pratt's mind/body duality mechanism
an alternative to mind/body coupling via BECs?
Dear Richard,
yes, there is an isomorphsim between the two, no need for coupling. ;-)
--
Onward!
Stephen
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
