On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Craig Weinberg <whatsons...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Friday, January 11, 2013 12:02:57 PM UTC-5, John Clark wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at Roger Clough <rcl...@verizon.net> wrote: >> >>> > So either there's no ether, or light has a fixed velocity. >> >> >> No, light has a fixed velocity with or without the aether, it's a >> experimental result not a theory. So either the luminiferous aether does not >> exist or it does but doesn't do anything of interest, in which case >> physicists have better things to do with their time than investigate it >> further. >> >> John K Clark >> > > My understanding is that light has the same velocity as 'change' or 'news' > does, which is always 'the maximum possible rate in spacetime'. Light is not > literally present in a vacuum, but manifests only in the sensory-motor > qualities of matter. Its velocity is virtual. > > Craig What makes you think that light is not present in a vacuum? Richard
> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/everything-list/-/NkFR9yeGUvsJ. > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
