On 28 Sep 2013, at 16:58, John Clark wrote:

On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 3:16 AM, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:

> Everett mention what you call "feeling of identity", which is a consequence of modeling the observer by a machine

It doesn't matter if "modeling the observer by a machine" is valid or not, if tomorrow somebody remembers being Bruno Marchal today then Bruno Marchal has a future,

That's my point. So in the WM duplication, the experiencer has a future. In fact, he has two futures, and their are logically incompatible, *from The 1-pov* point of view. As he knows in advance that he will feel, whoever he is, live only one (again, from The 1-pov).




if not then Bruno Marchal has no future, and Quantum Mechanics or a understanding of Everett's Many Worlds is not needed for any of it.

It is the other way round.



Period. However in a completely different unrelated matter, if you want to assign a probability that tomorrow Bruno Marchal will observe a electron move left or right then you will need Quantum Mechanics, and some (including me) feel that Everett's interpretation is a convenient way to think about it, although there are other ways.

I use Everett QM to illustrate a more general phenomenon, which applies in the classical setting of machine's calssical duplication.



> With comp [...]

Does "comp" mean every event must have a cause?

No. And "cause" is a complex high level notion. Then with comp every event has a reason, but not necessarily a "physical cause". That is an open problem.


That question has a simple yes or no answer,

Or "Open problem". But irrelevant for the FPI.



and you made up the word so you must know the answer, what is it? If it's yes then I don't believe in this thing you call "comp".

It is "irrelevant open problem".



> in all cases we have one future, in the first person pov

It is revealing that in explaining the theory of personal identity Bruno Marchal must always insert vague undefined personal pronouns like "we" or "you" or "I" at key points despite the fact that if it were already clear what those pronouns referred to then the entire matter would already be settled.

I give a simple definition of the 1-I and 3-I, in the UDA context (and anoher definition in the AUDA, based on the Dx = "xx" method used to define self-reference in computer science. You are the one describing this as pee-pee stuf when I make this precise, and then you don't take the definition into account. I don't see the rationality here.




Thus regardless of what "comp" means it is certain that if Everett is correct then Bruno Marchal has more than one future;

In God' eyes, or in the 3p view, but the 1p-view remains unique. You will not *feel* being in M and W, and the question is about what you (in Helsinki) can expect to feel. In all case, he will feel to be a unique person having been selected for one future relatively to who he remembers to be (the guy in Helsinki).

You just continue to ignore the 1p and 3p distinction.

Bruno



as to the question "does "he" have more than one future?", well, that has the same answer as the question "how long is a piece of string?". But no doubt I am confusing the first person view of the second person view of the third person view with the second person view of the first person view of the third person view once removed on my mother's side.

By the way, exactly when does this "first person pov" occur in a given experiment and how long does it last? If it's what I'm feeling right now then it's not going to last for long because "right now" doesn't last for long.

  John K Clark






--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to