On 28 Sep 2013, at 20:25, meekerdb wrote:
On 9/28/2013 12:01 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
...
Prohibition is only a technic to sell a lot of drugs, without
quality control, nor price control, + the ability to directly
target all kids on all streets, making huge black markets, and
leading to important corruption so that prohibition is continued,
and the fear selling business can be pursued. Nixon, Reagan, but
also Chirac and people in the UK, are known having ordered studies
on marijuana, and put the result in the trash (as *all* independent
studies have shown marijuana far less toxic and addictive than
alcohol, etc.).
The society "A partnership for a drug free America" is financed by
the industries of alcohol, tobacco, guns and scientology. Which
says a lot.
It explains why the legal drugs are the dangerous one (oil,
alcohol, tobacco, ...), and the illegal drugs are mostly innocuous
(french cheese, cannabis, ...). Prohibition makes the state into a
drug dealer, and transforms the planet into a big Chicago.
Pollution and climate change comes from there too, as Henry Ford
already asked why to use non sustainable oil, when hemp guarantied
atmospheric equilibrium. The green should invest in
antiprohibitionism.
After the NDAA 2012, the "war on terror" seems to me to be like the
"war on drugs". Pure fear selling business. It is a quasi-
confession. Obama could have said simply "we are the terrorist".
Since them, I have few doubt that 9/11 is an inside job, and the
evidences are rather big that this is the case, especially when you
look at the NIST report, which is technically as convincing than
the papers on the danger of cannabis.
I agree with most of what you wrote above, but that last is
nonsense. There is no way the government could have engineered the
9/11 attacks without it being leaked even before it happened.
Remember Occam, you need to take the simplest explanation.
It is the simplest explanation of why Obama signed the NDAA, and
refused to change the language (just one or two commas more, and that
would have been OK, but they are still missing and his administration
refused to add the commas since, and this despite the fact that the
supreme court has judged it unconstitutional).
Then you might try to explain to me how you answer the questions asked
by the Engineers & Architect about how building seven did fall, and
many other many questions. (But this is out-of-topic, we can discuss
this in the youtube comments on some video, I will look for the
clearest).
I am not saying that 9/11 is an inside job, but I am saying that I
have now more evidences that it is, than that it is not.
After the NDAA 2012, the war on terror looks suspiciously similar to
the war on drugs.
Bruno
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
