Sure, that would set up synchronization of sensory data input streams, but
it does not address my question: How does the AGI come so interprete those
data streams in a way that is compatible with ours?

   If we build the robot body with EMF exitation sensors that operate in
the same range as ours and with sensors for atmospheric pressure wave
sequences as our ears, etc. Then maybe it might "experience" a world like
ours, but how can we be sure?

   This is the same question as: How can I be sure that your experience of
Blue is the exact same as mine? I have tried to build a bisimulation
argument that might show this but it has not worked very well at all. It is
frustrating....


On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:54 PM, LizR <lizj...@gmail.com> wrote:

> By the way, one possible scenario would be that the AI is provided with a
> body - we could imagine that it's attached via radio, say, to an android
> that is apparently human. To make this scenario deliberately extreme, for
> the sake of argument, if the AI only interacts with the world via this
> android, it might not (at least in a Philip K Dick short story) even
> realise it isn't just another human, like the ones it interacts with every
> day. In this particular scenario, it seems very unlikely it wouldn't be
> aware that other people existed.
>
> (Excuse me, I have to go AFK for a bit. I need to recharge my batteries...)
>
>
>
> On 5 September 2014 13:08, LizR <lizj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 5 September 2014 12:58, Stephen Paul King <stephe...@provensecure.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi LizR,
>>>
>>>    I will repeat my question: What makes us think that the AGI will be
>>> aware that we exist?
>>>
>>
>> Surely that depends on circumstances? If an AI is created and educated by
>> people then it will at least be aware that there is something feeding it
>> input, and it will probably make the same deductions about that something
>> that we make about other people. If it occurs through some sort of
>> spontaneous generation, if that's possible, it may not be aware that we
>> exist. Did you have a particular scenario in mind?
>>
>>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/everything-list/YJeHJO5dNqQ/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



-- 

Kindest Regards,

Stephen Paul King

Senior Researcher

Mobile: (864) 567-3099

stephe...@provensecure.com

 http://www.provensecure.us/


“This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of
the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain
information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential and
exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may be constituted as
attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of
this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
message in error, notify sender immediately and delete this message
immediately.”

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to