On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 12:46 PM, John Clark <johnkcl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 10:43 AM, <agrayson2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> If the measurement problem were solved in the sense being able to predict >> exact outcomes, >> > > That's not the measurement problem, its determining if how and why > observation effects things. > Not to split hairs, but why we get what we get in quantum measurements, and how measurement outcomes come to be what they are, are the same problem IMO. > > > >> thus making QM a deterministic theory, would that imply an INCONSISTENCY >> in the postulates of QM? >> > > It's not just Quantum Mechanics, Bell proved that any theory that is > deterministic must be nonlocal or non realistic or both, otherwise it > would be inconsistent with experimental results. > > John K Clark > > > > > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/ > topic/everything-list/j3RV_cLRfts/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
