On 9/16/2019 6:22 AM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Monday, September 16, 2019 at 5:58:58 AM UTC-6, John Clark wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 4:49 AM Philip Thrift <cloud...@gmail.com
<javascript:>> wrote:
> "Many Worlds" (as demonstrated via Sean Carroll here)
demonstrates a failure of theoretical physics, or philosophy,
or both.
And I think the above demonstrates a lack of courage to face the
possibility that reality may be structured in ways you do not
like. As Carl Sagan said "/The universe is not required to be in
perfect harmony with human ambition/".
John K Clark
When physics began to give non-intuitive results, in QM
*and* Relativity, people when overboard. Now any patently absurd
result finds its justification among true believers. So what happened
to the (non-covariant)
You need to read this:
http://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2016/08/15/you-should-love-or-at-least-respect-the-schrodinger-equation/
Brent
wf after the measurement? Nothing. Like a horserace when it reaches
conclusion, it's no longer applicable. That simple! The collapse
hypothesis is just a bookkeeping device to get rid of it! AG
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/31aa3956-a0be-af5e-2959-905ef54eb62e%40verizon.net.
