On Friday, September 20, 2019 at 6:31:15 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 17 Sep 2019, at 16:04, Philip Thrift <cloud...@gmail.com <javascript:>> 
> wrote:
>
>
> From a pragmatic perspective, I do not see any Everettian MW (theory, 
> math, ideas, formulations, interpretations or whatever they want to call 
> it) in computational quantum mechanics:
>
>
> https://www.simonsfoundation.org/flatiron/center-for-computational-quantum-physics/software
>
> If MW were important, it would be there.
>
>
>
> All computational theory (quantum or not) implies the "Many Computations”. 
>
> Bruno
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/cde4e698-1c19-4ad2-b6cb-c1aa343fdec9%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to