Do you have a paper explaining this?
Brent
On 9/6/2020 7:24 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
I think you are helping yourself to probabilities by implicitly
assuming a measure.
It is not obvious, but there is a measure for the first person views,
plural ([]p & <>t) and singular ([]p & p, []p & <>t & p).
I have realised more or less recently that the measure is inherited
from a measure on the sigma_1 set + arbitrary oracles, that is the
union of all sigma_1(/a/) for /a/ being a real (or complex number).
This requires a bit of Descriptive Set theory.
So, there is a measure, even a Lebesgue Measure. There is an integral,
normally Feynman’s one, if both Mechanism, and Quantum Mechanics are
correct.
It took me some time to admit that the invariance of the first person
for the Universal-Dovetailer-steps “delays” enforces the presence of
all oracular computations. It is a continuum, with a complicated
structure determined by the modes of self-reference (which are 8,
although there are more like 4 + 4 * infinity).
Bruno
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/5F5521FF.5080005%40verizon.net.
