On Sunday, June 23, 2024 at 10:12:28 PM UTC+2 John Clark wrote:
On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 3:01 PM PGC <multipl...@gmail.com> wrote: > *Do note, I am not making a claim that there is nothing to LLMs and their recent boost in applications, capacity, conveniences offered, and similar developments. But it’s narrow AI by definition* By what definition? The standard definition of everybody from Science Fiction authors to the field of research. The one you are already well aware of. Ask your LLM of choice, perform a search on your search engine, or go to Wikipedia regarding narrow or weak AI: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_artificial_intelligence And for everybody here assuming the Mechanist ontology, which implies the Strong AI thesis, i.e. the assertion that a machine can think, I am curious as to why any of you would assume that general intelligence and mind would arise from a narrow AI. Narrow is the opposite of some advanced Turing + machine with inductive reasoning abilities, which partly define it. Because sure, such a machine could conceive of, run, emulate, implement, build any possible narrow AI by definition, but not the opposite. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/c2d4928a-6440-472c-a64b-d12cb15c54can%40googlegroups.com.
