And what would you fancy as an "underlying physicality"?

Brent


On 11/8/2024 1:14 AM, Alan Grayson wrote:
The map. Ultimately we're seeking the physicality underlying the correlations. AG

On Friday, November 8, 2024 at 1:49:48 AM UTC-7 Brent Meeker wrote:




    On 11/7/2024 8:17 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


    On Thursday, November 7, 2024 at 7:12:02 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker wrote:




        On 11/7/2024 5:20 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


        On Thursday, November 7, 2024 at 4:53:37 PM UTC-7 Brent
        Meeker wrote:




            On 11/7/2024 2:28 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


            On Thursday, November 7, 2024 at 3:22:53 PM UTC-7 Brent
            Meeker wrote:




                On 11/6/2024 12:40 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


                On Wednesday, November 6, 2024 at 11:31:03 AM
                UTC-7 John Clark wrote:

                    On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 4:23 AM Alan Grayson
                    <[email protected]> wrote:

                        /> An effect between entangled pairs but
                        no information sent? Doesn't make sense. AG/


                    *It's weird but it does not produce a logical
                    contradiction. Suppose you and I have quantum
                    entangled coins, I stay on earth but you get
                    in your Spaceship and travel at nearly the
                    speed of light for a little over four years to
                    Alpha Centauri, then you slow down and start
                    flipping your coin and I do the same on Earth.
                    We both write down a record of all the heads
                    and tails we got and both of us conclude that
                    the sequences we got are perfectly random.
                    Then you get back in your spaceship and four
                    years later you're back home. And now that
                    you're back we compare our lists of "random"
                    coin flips and we find that the two sequences
                    are identical, we both got the same "random"
                    sequence.*

                    *That's very weird but neither of us noticed
                    anything was strange until you got back, and
                    that took over four years because Alpha
                    Centauriis four light years away. If we try to
                    use our coins discern a message by Morse code
                    with heads meaning a dot and tails meaning a
                    dash it won't work because your coin will only
                    come up the way you want it to 50% of the
                    time.You could of course force your coin to
                    come up heads or tails, but if you did that
                    you would destroy the quantum entanglement
                    because it is very delicate, and then you
                    would just have two ordinary unrelated coins. *


                Two observers can't send information to each other
                because neither knows what will come up in a coin
                flip if the outcome is modeled quantum
                mechanically, that is irreducibly random , but
                each element of a pair of entangled particles can
                send information to its partner, since if it
                couldn't, they wouldn't be entangled. AG
                First of all you need to realize that "entangled
                particles" is just shorthand. Particles aren't
                entangled.  Some property of the particles is
                entangled, e.g. spin or momentum or position.  So
                in Hilbert space, instead of there being two
                different vector components for the spin of A and
                the spin of B, there is only one vector for the
                spin of both A and B.  So Alice can measure it and
                B can measure it.  But neither can change or
                control the measurement.  It's random.

                Brent


            Yes, I am aware of that. Alice and Bob can't send
            messages to each other. But does either of the
            particles send anything to the other? That's the issue.
            It's called an "effect". But an effect must have some
            actual content, if it exists. AG
            The "content" is they share a vector in Hilbert space.

            Brent


        Have you ever seen a vector in Hilbert space? AG
        If the photons hitting your eye weren't a vector in Hilbert
        space you wouldn't see anything.

        Brent


    Were people born before Hilbert blind? You're confusing the map
    from the territory. AG
    Are directions and amplitudes map or territory?

    Brent
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
    Google Groups "Everything List" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
    send an email to [email protected].
    To view this discussion visit
    
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/939207ad-4edd-462c-9f19-fb50d6aaf034n%40googlegroups.com
    
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/939207ad-4edd-462c-9f19-fb50d6aaf034n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/c53159e9-2832-4b75-9638-81a4cbbf3c35n%40googlegroups.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/c53159e9-2832-4b75-9638-81a4cbbf3c35n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/c57db764-be54-4498-af2f-d0ed0b47a5f7%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to