On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 9:06 PM Brent Meeker <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> *>>>> I propose Meeker's equation, which is the same as Schrodinger's >>> equation except that the worlds orthogonal to our own disappear when they >>> become orthogonal. Meeker's equation has also shown to be correct by all >>> known tests. * >> >> >> *>>> You're too late, the objective collapse people have already modified >> Schrödinger's equation by adding a nonlinear randomly determined term to it >> that makes an already difficult to solve equation far far more difficult. * >> >> *> >Hence the advantage of the Meeker equation which is no harder to >> solve than Schroedinger's equation.* >> > > *> If you have really found such a marvelous equation you should publish a > paper and let the world know about it! * > > *>It's just the Schroedinger equation plus the rule that once your world > is orthogonal to others, they vanish.* > *What a disappointment! By adding that one unnecessary rule you've implicitly added an astronomical number, and possibly an infinite number, of assumptions; William of Ockham must be spinning in his grave at close to the speed of light. Even worse, you've made it impossible to understand why physics has two sets of laws, one set works when you're looking at something, and the other set works when you aren't.* * John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>* wda -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv14%2B%2B6O%3D3mxCwuVb4S79PzL7wKCb2hZsXn3-dmznG-8qw%40mail.gmail.com.
