On 1/9/2025 5:01 AM, John Clark wrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 9:06 PM Brent Meeker <[email protected]> wrote:

            />>>> I propose Meeker's equation, which is the same as
            Schrodinger's equation except that the worlds orthogonal
            to our own disappear when they become orthogonal. 
            Meeker's equation has also shown to be correct by all
            known tests.
            /


        *>>> You're too late, the objective collapse people have
        already modified Schrödinger's equation by adding a
        nonlinear randomly determined term to it that makes an
        already difficult to solve equation far far more difficult. *
        /> >Hence the advantage of the Meeker equation which is no
        harder to solve than Schroedinger's equation./


    *> If you have really found such a marvelous equation you should
    publish a paper and let the world know about it! *
    />It's just the Schroedinger equation plus the rule that once your
    world is orthogonal to others, they vanish./


*What a disappointment! By adding that one unnecessary rule you've implicitly added an astronomical number, and possibly an infinite number, of assumptions; *
It's not an assumption.  It's a consistently observed fact, which the cult of MWI seeks to hide on other worlds.

*William of Ockham must be spinning in his grave at close to the speed of light. Even worse, you've made it impossible to understand why physics has two sets of laws, one set works when you're looking at something, and the other set works when you aren't.**
*
That's your out of date view which you seek to attribute to me.  I have never presented or defended the view that a person or other being has to look at something to split worlds.  It's supposedly there somewhere in MWI although it's left somewhat hand-wavy that decoherence must do it.

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/17534a21-f1cf-4151-b84b-de7ffd16e7eb%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to