OK-- that's what I said. I just used more words. Well, lots more words. :-)
Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben & Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 4:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Room Auto Accept Why should he, when you can't summon the ability to search Technet yourself? "This Chris fellow" has been providing support to this forum for years. Don't look a gift horse in the mouth. -- Drew ******************************** Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Success without honor is an unseasoned dish; it will satisfy your hunger, but it won't taste good. -- Joe Paterno -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steven Cox Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 3:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Room Auto Accept You can say alotta bad things about the Arsehole Union, but you can't deny the coming to the defense of their members :) Time to face the unavoidable facts, this Chris fellow was wrong and is puffing up his chest in a vain attempt to divert attention from his blunder. When one makes an extraordinary claim, one best be prepared to offer extraordinary proof to back your case up. Heck , this chap can't even summon up the strength to type out 6 digits. -s- > -----Original Message----- > From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 3:55 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Conference Room Auto Accept > > > It doesn't taste of smackdown. Yet. > > -- Drew > ******************************** > Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! > We cannot do evil to others without doing it to ourselves. -- > Joseph Francois > Eduard Desmahis > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steven Cox > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 2:45 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Conference Room Auto Accept > > > Let's not be that way shall we? I asked a legitimate > question, and if you > didn't feel the need to answer then there was no need to say > anything at > all. The concept of "if you can't say something nice..." is > something most > people pick up in kindergarden or earlier, might be time for > a refresher > course in how to act like a decent human being :) > > I stand by my original words, plenty of experience with > multiple Exch boxes > has provided nary a glitch caused by an Outlook install. Is > it possible > that Outlook causes problems in some situations? I'm sure it > is, but making > the universal claim to NEVER install Outlook on an Exch box was simply > begging for a reference. Basically, I called you on your sh*t and you > weinered out. > > So, are you feeling motivated to look it up "for me" now or > does this taste > of smackdown suit you? > > -s- > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 2:56 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Conference Room Auto Accept > > > > > > It would have required that I go look it up for you. I knew > > where the data > > was, but didn't bother to memorize the Q number. I shall > > endeavor to try > > harder for you next time. > > > > Chris > > -- > > Chris Scharff > > Senior Sales Engineer > > MessageOne > > If you can't measure, you can't manage! > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Steven Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 1:51 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Conference Room Auto Accept > > > > > > > > > Interestingly enough, the same number of keystrokes could > > > have been used to display a knowledgebase article "Qxxxxxx" > > > to which you're alluding. But that would be too > > > straightforward, eh? :) > > > > > > -s- > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 2:23 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: Conference Room Auto Accept > > > > > > > > > > > > TechNet. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Steven Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 7:34 AM > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > Subject: RE: Conference Room Auto Accept > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hmm... I've had Outlook98/2K installed on several Exchange > > > > > 5.5 boxes (needed for certain backup agents, the InterOrg > > > > > Synchronization Tool, etc) without any detrimental effects. > > > > Sources? > > > > > > > > > > -s- > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 11:23 PM > > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > > Subject: RE: Conference Room Auto Accept > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What ever you do. Do NOT install Outlook on the > > > Exchange server. > > > > > > There has been known problems with that > > configuration. Because > > > > > > Exchange Server uses a different MAPI dll than Outlook. > > > > > > > > > > > > Andrew, > > > > > > MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
