This is all very neat and entertaining but I would like to ask again if anyone has had any trouble with this combo? I am also wondering if anyone has any pro-cons regarding Exchangecode script vs. outlook2k option? Thanks for not smacking me down.
John -----Original Message----- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 1:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Room Auto Accept Mr. Cox, I'm a bit confused. I've been trying diligently over the past months to be a kinder and gentler list participant. I gave you the source of the information and gently explained why I did not cite the Q number. I also promised to try harder in the future. In response I get accused of not being a nice human being and what appears to be an attempt to belittle me and question my integrity. I guess you thought you might humiliate me or force me into doing unpaid research for you. Unfortunately for you, your attempt has failed and earned you a special place in my kill file. I suggest future smackdown attempts be made in person, so that your internet bravado can be greeted with a large dose of personal reality. *plonk* Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! > -----Original Message----- > From: Steven Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 2:45 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Conference Room Auto Accept > > > Let's not be that way shall we? I asked a legitimate > question, and if you didn't feel the need to answer then > there was no need to say anything at all. The concept of "if > you can't say something nice..." is something most people > pick up in kindergarden or earlier, might be time for a > refresher course in how to act like a decent human being :) > > I stand by my original words, plenty of experience with > multiple Exch boxes has provided nary a glitch caused by an > Outlook install. Is it possible that Outlook causes problems > in some situations? I'm sure it is, but making the universal > claim to NEVER install Outlook on an Exch box was simply > begging for a reference. Basically, I called you on your > sh*t and you weinered out. > > So, are you feeling motivated to look it up "for me" now or > does this taste of smackdown suit you? > > -s- > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 2:56 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Conference Room Auto Accept > > > > > > It would have required that I go look it up for you. I knew > > where the data > > was, but didn't bother to memorize the Q number. I shall > > endeavor to try > > harder for you next time. > > > > Chris > > -- > > Chris Scharff > > Senior Sales Engineer > > MessageOne > > If you can't measure, you can't manage! > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Steven Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 1:51 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Conference Room Auto Accept > > > > > > > > > Interestingly enough, the same number of keystrokes could > > > have been used to display a knowledgebase article "Qxxxxxx" > > > to which you're alluding. But that would be too > > > straightforward, eh? :) > > > > > > -s- > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 2:23 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: Conference Room Auto Accept > > > > > > > > > > > > TechNet. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Steven Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 7:34 AM > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > Subject: RE: Conference Room Auto Accept > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hmm... I've had Outlook98/2K installed on several > Exchange 5.5 > > > > > boxes (needed for certain backup agents, the InterOrg > > > > > Synchronization Tool, etc) without any detrimental effects. > > > > Sources? > > > > > > > > > > -s- > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 11:23 PM > > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > > Subject: RE: Conference Room Auto Accept > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What ever you do. Do NOT install Outlook on the > > > Exchange server. > > > > > > There has been known problems with that > > configuration. Because > > > > > > Exchange Server uses a different MAPI dll than Outlook. > > > > > > > > > > > > Andrew, > > > > > > MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
