Well, I for one would surely benefit from it, and appreciate the
offer. I look forward to it.

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Bingham, Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is this where we hum "Bob and Sherry, sitting in a tree…" ?
>
>
>
> Seriously, though, almost all the Archive vendors will work in a
> geographically disparate solution set… it's just a question of how, and how
> well…
>
>
>
> The archiving topic keeps coming up, and it seems most people are missing
> the two important starting points: everyone needs different things out of an
> archive system – they are not all equal; you need to understand what you
> need the system to do before you try to pick it.
>
>
>
> I'm thinking about writing up something basic guidelines on Archiving 101…
> no vendor specific details, just some of the various ways it is implemented
> and considerations, from personal experience.  Would that prove useful to
> the group?  If so, and I actually find time to throw it together, would
> Michael or one of you guys with an actuall posting place/history be willing
> to commandeer/enhance it?
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:51 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: email archiving
>
>
>
> Ewwww, no
>
> SEA = Sherry E. Abercrombie  (really, those are my initials)
>
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Tom Strader - NCBPAC Systems Administrator
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> SEA = Shook in his underwear.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 3:29 PM
>
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: email archiving
>
>
>
> Hmmm, I get the impression that Bob likes SEA....
>
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Bob Fronk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If I am not mistaken... SEA will do that.
>
> Bob Fronk
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only and may contain
> privileged, confidential, or proprietary information that is exempt from
> disclosure under law.  If you have received this message in error, please
> inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail and destroy any
> printed copy.   Thank you.
>
> ________________________________
>
>

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~             http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja                ~

Reply via email to