Hey, be nice to customers of Sunbelt! They pay for this list! ;-) Alex
________________________________ From: Kent, Larry CTR USA IMCOM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 3:52 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: email archiving I get the impression that Bob like SEA men :) j/k ________________________________ From: Tom Strader - NCBPAC Systems Administrator [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 3:46 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: email archiving SEA = Shook in his underwear. ________________________________ From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 3:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: email archiving Hmmm, I get the impression that Bob likes SEA.... On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Bob Fronk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If I am not mistaken... SEA will do that. Bob Fronk [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -----Original Message----- > From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 2:16 PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: Re: email archiving > > Ah. > > I'm looking at an archiving solution to take care of three servers, > one each in the UK, US and Australia. That'lll prove interesting. > We're currently using MJ to get all mail to a mailbox here, and > (YUCK!) manually archiving to PSTs. It's painful, sinful, and a > heinous waste of time and resources, along with being not useful in > the event that we need to recover email. Thanks be to Chuthulu that we > haven't yet run into a discovery motion, or anything like it. > > Kurt > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Bob Fronk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just one Exchange server. (However I do have a replicate server using > > DoubleTake at another site) > > > > Bob Fronk > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 1:54 PM > >> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > >> Subject: Re: email archiving > >> > >> How many Exchange servers, and how widely separated are they? > >> > >> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 6:46 AM, Bob Fronk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > Journaling is NOT enabled. I am using SEA's Direct Archive and see > > very > >> > little (if any)impact on our Exchange server. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Bob Fronk > >> > > >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:40 AM > >> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > >> > Subject: RE: email archiving > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Bob are you running it with journaling turned off? > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:34 AM > >> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > >> > Subject: RE: email archiving > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > I am using SEA and am very happy with it. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Bob Fronk > >> > > >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:29 AM > >> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > >> > Subject: RE: email archiving > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > I didn't think there were any specific regs concerning HIPAA and > > email > >> > retention. > >> > > >> > Anyone on the list using our hosts product? Sunbelt Archiver. They > > do > >> > mention that it doesn't require journaling turned on. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:38 AM > >> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > >> > Subject: email archiving > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is old > > hat. > >> > > >> > We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside vendor. > > I don't > >> > know much about it except they put an appliance on our network and > > turn > >> > Journaling "on" on our Exchange server, and it's wildly expensive. > >> > > >> > Can someone give me an "in-a-nutshell" explanation of how this > > works? Is > >> > this the best solution for our money? Any alternatives? We are a > >> > non-profit behavioral health facility trying to stay HIPAA > > compliant. > >> > > >> > We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003. Approx 250 mailboxes and > > right now > >> > my total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub). > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > > >> > Paul Everett > >> > IS Dept. > >> > Lee Mental Health Center > >> > 239-791-1551 > >> > > >> > "Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth > > Cooper > >> > Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis > > Services. > >> > Visit our website at www.leementalhealth.org to learn more." > >> > > >> > Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any > > attachments, is > >> > for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain > > confidential > >> > and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, > > disclosure, or > >> > distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, > > please > >> > contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the > > original > >> > message, including attachments. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and > > does not > >> > represent official Parkview Medical Center policy. > >> > > >> > This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named > > above, may be > >> > confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as such > > in > >> > accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the intended > >> > recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this > > communication, or > >> > any of its contents, is prohibited. If you have received this > > communication > >> > in error, please return to sender and delete the message from your > > computer > >> > system. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and > > does not > >> > represent official Parkview Medical Center policy. > >> > > >> > This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named > > above, may be > >> > confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as such > > in > >> > accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the intended > >> > recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this > > communication, or > >> > any of its contents, is prohibited. If you have received this > > communication > >> > in error, please return to sender and delete the message from your > > computer > >> > system. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ > >> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ > > > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ > > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ > > > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ -- Sherry Abercrombie "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." Arthur C. Clarke ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~
