Its that "$" sign thats the issue in the UK! The £/$ ratio seems to fluctuate
between almost 1 to 1 to nearly 2 - 1...
Dave Wade
Business Services I.C.T.
0161 474 5456
________________________________
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: 21 August 2010 18:00
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange is history?: Moved two clients to GoogleApps this
week.
I'm not sure it's outrageous tbh, considering with Exchange you have a
CAL cost, an Antispam cost, an antivirus cost and (the expensive part) the
costs of having someone take care of it - it's the last part that I expect is
the issue for a lot of small businesses.
From: Matt Moore [mailto:mattmoore...@hotmail.com]
Sent: 21 August 2010 17:57
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange is history?: Moved two clients to GoogleApps this
week.
Wow that's pretty steep for the service they provide....... $50 a
seat, really????
From: stephan.b...@bdtechnology.org
[mailto:stephan.b...@bdtechnology.org] On Behalf Of Stephan Barr
Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2010 9:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange is history?: Moved two clients to GoogleApps this
week.
Goggle Apps cost $50 per seat, per email address, per year. There are
no other costs. For the $50 here's a short list of what you get:
* Vanity email address / your.n...@yourdomainname.com
* SSL
* AntiSpam, AntiVirus
* Postini
* 25GB of storage per email address
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 3:48 AM, Dave Wade <dave.w...@stockport.gov.uk>
wrote:
Paul,
I am a Radio Ham and one of the guys I chat to works in a small (about
25 staff) organization, and has just upgraded his system to Windows/2008r2 and
Exchange 2010. When I expressed suprise that he wasn't out sourcing to Google
apps or some thing of that ilk he said when costed over 4 years it looked very
expensive, especially given the uncertainty in pricing given we work in
Sterling...
Dave Wade
0161 474 5456
________________________________
From: Paul Hutchings
Sent: Fri 20/08/2010 17:13
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange is history?: Moved two clients to GoogleApps this
week.
I've never really seen it as "Google vs. Exchange" tbh, I think both do
different things and suit different needs.
Office with half a dozen people and no real IT need or infrastructure
and I think I'd find it hard to see past Google Apps or Hosted Exchange,
even scaled up to a couple dozen staff and a single server I'm not sure
Exchange would be first choice simply because if nothing else you do
need to back it up and someone needs to ensure that happens.
On the other hand, if you have a few dozen or a few hundred users and
have even a modest investment in things like a SAN or vmware and decent
connectivity and someone with IT knowledge then I'm not sure it's so
easy a decision.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:jasongu...@npumail.com]
Sent: 20 August 2010 13:23
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange is history?: Moved two clients to GoogleApps this
week.
Would definitely be interested in some details as far as client size,
feature usage (shared calendars, contacts, etc...), and the technical
level of the users.
It seems from past things I've read, the service is better suited to
companies with a greater proportion of more savvy users.
Jason
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephan Barr [mailto:stephanbarr.li...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 19:14
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Exchange is history?: Moved two clients to GoogleApps
this
> week.
>
> Maybe you haven't used it recently. Groups do not count as email
> addresses and meet the need of distribution lists and shared boxes.
>
> definitely different cost model. Per each client they will save
thousands
> per year.
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Duncan Turnbull
<dun...@e-simple.co.nz>
> wrote:
>
>
> There is a different cost model here, and some limitations but
> various upsides
>
> One big issue I see is if you have lots of shared mailboxes e.g.
> for client projects or other reasons then you have to pay for all of
> those as a license, as always it will be horses for courses
>
> What about Microsoft Live
>
> Cheers Duncan
>
> On 20/08/2010, at 9:59 AM, Stephan Barr wrote:
>
>
> Super easy. Customers love it.
>
>
--
MIRA Ltd
Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England.
Registered in England and Wales No. 402570
VAT Registration GB 114 5409 96
The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use
of the intended recipient.
If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us
either by e-mail, telephone or fax.
You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the
e-mail as this is prohibited.
**********************************************************************
Stockport Council - providing over 600 different services to local
people . More information on http://www.stockport.gov.uk/boost
(free internet access is available at all Stockport libraries)
This email, and any files transmitted with it, is confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. As a public body, the Council may be required to
disclose this email, or any response to it, under the Freedom of Information
Act 2000, unless the information in it is covered by one of the exemptions in
the Act.
If you receive this email in error please notify Stockport ICT,
Business Services via email.qu...@stockport.gov.uk and then permanently remove
it from your system.
Thank you.
http://www.stockport.gov.uk <http://www.stockport.gov.uk/>
**********************************************************************
