+1 On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 1:15 PM, John Hornbuckle < john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us> wrote:
> Is there some evidence to indicate that if one uses Google to host their > data, they’re agreeing to allow Google to use their data? > > > > We use Google/Postini to archive our e-mail, and I saw nothing in our > contract that would make the mining of our data by Google acceptable. > > > > And while I’m reasonably confident that our network is secure, I’ll readily > admit that Google’s is very likely more secure than ours. In all honesty, > our data is likely safer within their infrastructure than within our own. > > > > > > > > John Hornbuckle > > MIS Department > > Taylor County School District > > www.taylor.k12.fl.us > > > > > > > > > > *From:* Matt Moore [mailto:mattmoore...@hotmail.com] > *Sent:* Sunday, August 22, 2010 12:48 PM > *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: Exchange is history?: Moved two clients to GoogleApps this > week. > > > > Oh yes! And not to just anyone, the biggest data miners in the world. > > > > *From:* Hank . [mailto:hgedr...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Sunday, August 22, 2010 4:50 AM > *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: Exchange is history?: Moved two clients to GoogleApps this > week. > > > > But you forgot to mention that you get to give all of your data to someone > else. > > Remember one of the most basic of about security is that you maintain > physical control of your data. > > On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Stephan Barr < > stephanbarr.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Goggle Apps cost $50 per seat, per email address, per year. There are no > other costs. For the $50 here's a short list of what you get: > > - Vanity email address / your.n...@yourdomainname.com > - SSL > - AntiSpam, AntiVirus > - Postini > - 25GB of storage per email address > > > > > > On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 3:48 AM, Dave Wade <dave.w...@stockport.gov.uk> > wrote: > > Paul, > > > > I am a Radio Ham and one of the guys I chat to works in a small (about 25 > staff) organization, and has just upgraded his system to Windows/2008r2 and > Exchange 2010. When I expressed suprise that he wasn't out sourcing to > Google apps or some thing of that ilk he said when costed over 4 years it > looked very expensive, especially given the uncertainty in pricing given we > work in Sterling... > > > > *Dave Wade* > > *0161 474 5456* > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* Paul Hutchings > *Sent:* Fri 20/08/2010 17:13 > > > *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > *Subject:* RE: Exchange is history?: Moved two clients to GoogleApps this > week. > > > > I've never really seen it as "Google vs. Exchange" tbh, I think both do > > different things and suit different needs. > > > > Office with half a dozen people and no real IT need or infrastructure > > and I think I'd find it hard to see past Google Apps or Hosted Exchange, > > even scaled up to a couple dozen staff and a single server I'm not sure > > Exchange would be first choice simply because if nothing else you do > > need to back it up and someone needs to ensure that happens. > > > > On the other hand, if you have a few dozen or a few hundred users and > > have even a modest investment in things like a SAN or vmware and decent > > connectivity and someone with IT knowledge then I'm not sure it's so > > easy a decision. > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:jasongu...@npumail.com] > > Sent: 20 August 2010 13:23 > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > Subject: RE: Exchange is history?: Moved two clients to GoogleApps this > > week. > > > > Would definitely be interested in some details as far as client size, > > feature usage (shared calendars, contacts, etc...), and the technical > > level of the users. > > > > It seems from past things I've read, the service is better suited to > > companies with a greater proportion of more savvy users. > > Jason > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Stephan Barr [mailto:stephanbarr.li...@gmail.com] > > > Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 19:14 > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > > Subject: Re: Exchange is history?: Moved two clients to GoogleApps > > this > > > week. > > > > > > Maybe you haven't used it recently. Groups do not count as email > > > addresses and meet the need of distribution lists and shared boxes. > > > > > > definitely different cost model. Per each client they will save > > thousands > > > per year. > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Duncan Turnbull > > <dun...@e-simple.co.nz> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > There is a different cost model here, and some limitations but > > > various upsides > > > > > > One big issue I see is if you have lots of shared mailboxes e.g. > > > for client projects or other reasons then you have to pay for all of > > > those as a license, as always it will be horses for courses > > > > > > What about Microsoft Live > > > > > > Cheers Duncan > > > > > > On 20/08/2010, at 9:59 AM, Stephan Barr wrote: > > > > > > > > > Super easy. Customers love it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > MIRA Ltd > > > > Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England. > > > > Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 > > VAT Registration GB 114 5409 96 > > > > The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of > the intended recipient. > > If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by > e-mail, telephone or fax. > > You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail > as this is prohibited. > > > > > > > > > > > > > ********************************************************************** > Stockport Council - providing over 600 different services to local people . > More information on http://www.stockport.gov.uk/boost > > > > > (free internet access is available at all Stockport libraries) > > This email, and any files transmitted with it, is confidential and > > > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they > > are addressed. As a public body, the Council may be required to disclose > this email, or any response to it, under the Freedom of Information Act > 2000, unless the information in it is covered by one of the exemptions in > the Act. > > If you receive this email in error please notify Stockport ICT, Business > Services via email.qu...@stockport.gov.uk and then permanently remove it > from your system. > > Thank you. > > http://www.stockport.gov.uk > > > > > ********************************************************************** > > > > > > NOTICE: Florida has a broad public records law. Most written communications > to or from this entity are public records that will be disclosed to the > public and the media upon request. E-mail communications may be subject to > public disclosure. > >
