I think I will wait until reiser is as good as ext2---
I can't afford to experiment with the very core
of the system, but I hope it turns out to be
a good filesystem
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, you wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Jul 2000, Gavin Clark wrote:
>
> > Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2000 23:22:01 -0700
> > From: Gavin Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [expert] new reiser question
> >
> > on 7/23/00 11:00 PM, Vincent Danen wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Jul 23, 2000 at 09:43:26PM -0500, Vic wrote:
> > >
> > >> Just wondering,
> > >> how does everyone who is trying out the reiser fs like it?
> > >>
> > >> Any pros cons?
> >
> >
> > does anyone see it replacing EXT2 as the default anytime soon?
> >
>
> If you are a frequent reader of kernel traffic, kt.linuxcare.com, Alan Cox
> supposedly doesn't want Reiserfs in the kernel till at least 2.5, Reiser
> himself claims there are a bunch of FUD reasons Alan is making up, and
> there is a sort of flame war going on. Let's just say that Reiser and Cox
> don't want to get along too well. I personally believe we need Reiserfs to
> get a real edge against others, and it is annoying to apply the kernel
> patch each time hoping it works... I would much rather have built-in
> support!
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Ellick Chan
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Jul 23
