On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 20:16:46 -0500 gnerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm with you, Hoyt, re: the 486 version of Mandrake. There's still a > lot of legacy hardware out there that could use the Mandrake "ease of > use" touch with optimized performance. They'd probably have to ditch X > and go with some kind of SVGA solution (or maybe port one of the PDA > Xes), but IMO it would be worthwhile. >
I agree with the need for a 486 Mandrake. (I ahd to reinstall windbloze to my Libretto because I can't get a version of Linux that installs to it any more (hdd crash)) However shouldn't need to go with a mini X, after all 3.x X was running back in the days (not so long ago either) of RH 5.2 and Mandrake 6.0. Granted you won't have the latest AGP card driver but, I've never found an AGP card that worked well from an ISA slot *grin*. James > Mike > > Hoyt wrote: > > > I'd rather see the effort put into a 486 version of Mandrake than into a > > Debian-Mandrake. > > > > I'd rather see APIC support fixed. > > > > I'd rather see the Auto Install Floppy option fixed. > > > > Hoyt > > > >
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
