dfox wrote: > > And hardware that passes memtest86 may fail in a stressful session with > gcc. :( Memtest is sequential and performs a selected set of tests on > the memory, but it can't (or doesn't) simulate the somewhat random-like > access to memory that gcc does. Then again, gcc doesn't randomly 'walk' > all over your whole memory space, but only a small subsection of it. > > >> Tom Brinkman Corpus Christi, Texas > >
OK insert dumb question here: But wouldn't running SETI For a week straight 24/7 have this nice burn-in effect on a CPU? Femme
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
