-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Good afternoon, Vincent!

On Saturday 25 January 2003 02:52 pm, Vincent Danen wrote:

> Actually, speaking of which, has anyone used 4.x at all?  Any initial
> reactions to it compared to 3.x?

I set it up on one of my internal systems last weekend, and the only
conclusions I have reached, thus far, are thus:

1. Without doing any *real* certification or testing, my impression is that it
is faster than the 3.xx version I currently am running in production. 

2. Having a functional rollover that I can code into applications (that
actually appears to be working) is really nice. 

3. Thus far it is working nicely using a set of normalized 10,000 record
tables. 

Every once in awhile I kick it to see if it still works, but other than that,
after the shambles today, I haven't really had the time to experiment
further. However, I'll post my impressions once I really get my feet wet with
it.

Dave
- -- 
Dave Laird ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
The Used Kharma Lot / The Phoenix Project 
Web Page:   http://www.kharma.net updated 01/20/2003
Year 2 of running Mandrake Linux workstation on a 100% Microsoft-free system.
                                           
An automatic & random thought For the Minute:    
It's clever, but is it art?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+Mx6taE1ENZP1A28RAgfBAJ4o8hmGBdFzT78eiAlWh05D7g1KIACfbOal
EE+b3AyY0bkoX4uZ81u+gNE=
=y5rD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to