> EH> That's the silly part: we're not really even asking for > EH> development. We just want them to get rid of the rejection of > EH> non IE browsers. It would mean *less* work and less code if > EH> they didn't put it in to begin with. > > I think it would be more work. They'd have to test it with other > browsers, and since different ones DO act differently, they'd have > to develop code to work in all of them. It seems to be easier (= > cheaper) to just put in a check and ask users to use IE. > > Many times one can view the code from a page and see where to go > anyway, but when you do, it doesn't work right. We need to let > them know they should code for other browsers.
My point was that so many of us just make our browser say it's IE, so their "blocking" of non-IE browsers doesn't accomplish anything except annoyance on our end. They wouldn't have to test anything at all: just allow me to use what i want, at my own risk. I wouldn't even mind (so much) if they made me look at a popup saying "non IE users, proceed at your own risk" and click ok, instead of making me look at a popup that says no entre. eric -- Mandrake HowTo's & More: http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
