Thanks for confirming  my point. I ask you a blunt question that draws
out the implications of what you are saying, and you are at a loss as
to how to respond. Precisely. 


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Your first question misses my point so completely, I'm at a loss as
to how to respond.  And no, it's not hard to live in this town.  I
chose it and love it here. a
> 
> feste37 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:                               How many
Jews has Maharishi murdered? How many death camps has he set up? 
>  
>  It must be hard for you living in this town, surrounded by a movement
>  that resembles the Nazis so closely. 
>  
>  It seems to me that your mind is so distorted, heaven knows by what,
>  that you cannot make clear distinctions between things. 
>  
>  But welcome to this board. You truly belong here. 
>  
>  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
>  <mailander111@> wrote:
>  >
>  > I have no idea what you mean when you say, "And are these same ideas
>  being cloned onto splinter satsang groups?" As for your other
>  question, "Are there significant parallels between the Third Reich and
>  Mahesh's spiritual movement, I'd say definitely there are.  Name any
>  article of faith you find repeated in this town, name any of the often
>  repeated quotes of things Mahesh is supposed to have said, and it was
>  repeated and believed in Nazi Germany.  They didn't call it
>  enlightenment, but they were all striving to be the Ubermensch.  It
>  meant basically the same thing.  Devotion to the Guru was important,
>  and the Guru, for the SS, was Hitler.  They thought of themselves as
>  pure warriors monks.  They could get married, of course, but they had
>  to have permission from on high, and the girl had to pass muster. 
>  Purity of the nervous system was purity of the blood. They believed in
>  karma, and in performing action established in Being.  They believed
>  in detachment and they believed
>  >  in higher states of consciousness.  They had nine of them.  Gotta
>  run. a
>  > 
>  > Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote:                               
>  > 
>  > On Oct 14, 2007, at 6:06 PM, Angela Mailander wrote:
>  > 
>  > Yes, I totally agree.  Hitler was used by those who still want to
>  establish the New World Order.  In fact, he was told in those exact
>  terms, New World Order, that he would be "instrumental" in
>  establishing  it.  He wasn't told that he'd only be a  step along the
>  way, though.  He believed he was to be the big enchilada---the
>  thousand-year Reich was to be sat-yuga.  The antisemitism was not real
>  in the same sense that the terrorists we're all afraid of today are
>  not real. Hitler needed a single enemy to focus the people's attention
>  on.  There is even some evidence that Jews supplied him with the
>  notion that they could be that single enemy.  It's not conclusive
>  evidence, but certainly the Warburgs were involved in it, in spite of
>  the fact that Paul Warburg lost two close relatives in the death
>  camps.  a 
>  > 
>  > 
>  > 
>  > Are there really significant parallels between the Third Reich and
>  Mahesh "yogis" spiritual movement though? And are these same ideas
>  being cloned onto splinter satsang groups?
>  > 
>  > 
>  > Rick posted a very interesting link to a video which purported to be
>  by an ex-KGB agent which claimed groups like the KGB were observing
>  the TMO for ideas in undermining nations.
>  > 
>  >      
>  >                                
>  > 
>  >  Send instant messages to your online friends
>  http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
>  >
>  
>  
>      
>                                
> 
>  Send instant messages to your online friends
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
>


Reply via email to