--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "mainstream20016" > <mainstream20016@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante <no_reply@> wrote: > > > [snip] > > > > > > > > The stress-free schools link to the California TM school has been > > > disabled: > > > > > > http://www.stressfreeschools.org/video/california_school.html > > > > > > > > > there is another link which talks about TM in schools, but all > > > private/charter, so it's clear that the TMO is trying to keep the SF > > > public middle school's TM program hush-hush, as Chris, the Lynch > > > foundation spokesman clearly states above: > > > > > > http://www.stressfreeschools.org/video/stressfreeschools.html > > > > All directly involved are tip-toeing through the elephants to avoid > stirring up third-party > > opposition to public recognition of TM's good effect in this public > school.... > > but that doesn't address the future prospects of teaching TM > broadly, which will require a > > secular organization teaching TM as a secular technique, which will > happen soon, as a > > response of the need of the time. > > > How are they going to teach and maintain TM as a "secular technique" > while using the Puja to initiate? Surely they're not going to do away > with the Puja, eh? >
from #151229: 'Like a surgeon who scrubs for surgery outside of the surgical suite, away from the patient, the TM teacher can prepare for teaching TM by performing the puja privately, in an adjoining room.'
