--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "mainstream20016" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "mainstream20016" > > <mainstream20016@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "mainstream20016" > > > > <mainstream20016@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante <no_reply@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > [snip] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The stress-free schools link to the California TM school has been > > > > > > disabled: > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.stressfreeschools.org/video/california_school.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there is another link which talks about TM in schools, but all > > > > > > private/charter, so it's clear that the TMO is trying to keep > > the SF > > > > > > public middle school's TM program hush-hush, as Chris, the Lynch > > > > > > foundation spokesman clearly states above: > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.stressfreeschools.org/video/stressfreeschools.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > All directly involved are tip-toeing through the elephants to avoid > > > > stirring up third-party > > > > > opposition to public recognition of TM's good effect in this public > > > > school.... > > > > > but that doesn't address the future prospects of teaching TM > > > > broadly, which will require a > > > > > secular organization teaching TM as a secular technique, which will > > > > happen soon, as a > > > > > response of the need of the time. > > > > > > > > > > > > How are they going to teach and maintain TM as a "secular technique" > > > > while using the Puja to initiate? Surely they're not going to do away > > > > with the Puja, eh? > > > > > > > > > > from #151229: > > > 'Like a surgeon who scrubs for surgery outside of the surgical > > suite, away from the > > > patient, the TM teacher can prepare for teaching TM by performing > > the puja privately, in > > > an adjoining room.' > > > > Two questions: > > > > 1) Do the would-be meditaters bring fruit flowers and handkerchief? > > [Please explain] > > > > 2) Is all of this by *direct* instructions from Maharishi? > > > > > Maharishi has been flexible with aspects of the puja, including not requirng the student to > observe the teacher's performance of the puja. Maharishi might allow the teacher to > provide the fruit, flowers, and handkerchief, to further reassure the student. > > The TM technique's current irrelevance is due to the now overtly-religious TMO. The SIMS > period through 1975 saw TM taught as a secular technique, and incredibly wide > acceptance. Since the Sidhi program instruction in 1976, the TMO has not been able to > present itself as a non-religious organization. Not coincidently TM has since become > irrelevant. A return to secular TM instruction made available from a new, separate secular > teaching organization will allow its wide acceptance - the current affiliation with the > overtly-religious TMO will not.
Having now read most of your posts in this thread, I get the impression that this current effort to establish a 'secular' TMO is mainly an idea you have concocted and are promoting and that it didn't come from Maharishi. I also get the impression that you wouldn't hesitate to proceed to accomplish a 'secular' organization without his direct approval. In my eyes it's bad enough that the key substance of the initiation, the Puja, its importance and its implications, is being relegated to darkness, and that the would-be meditaters are totally excluded from it. In my view, your proposition is not only dangerously contra to maintaining the purity of the teaching, but flat out dishonest. I also find it appalling that a TM teacher would resort to having to hide truths about TM from the general public.
