--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > off_world_beings wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "boo_lives" <boo_lives@> > > wrote: > > > > > >>> Nabs is delirious again, Mary--just keep that in mind.:) > >>> > > Whether > > > >>> it's 'worth it' or not isn't the issue. Most people here agree > >>> > > with > > > >>> your assessment of the TMO's ridiculous prices. > >>> > >>> Sal > >>> > >> Mary, I learned TM for $35 in the early 70s, and it was $125 (for > >> adults, less for students) when I taught it later in the 70s. >> > >> > > > > Yes, it seems Maharishi learned since then that flakey people come > > knocking if it is free, or cheap, so he wants more responsible people > > coming around. > > > > So if a person is studying to be a doctor or an engineer or an > > architect or international finance, then the cost would dissapear > > into their student loans as negligible. > > If a person is already graduated and successful as one of those > > people above then the cost is negligible. > > > > Seems to make sense to me, he would get more responsible and > > pragmatic people than you or I that way. > > > > OffWorld > > > > > Oh baloney! >>
Ok, but it sounded good at the time. :) The rest of your post is baloney. OffWorld