--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <rick@> wrote: > > > > On Behalf Of authfriend > > > > > Not everyone thought his comments were "unsubstantial." > > > I found many of them extremely meaty. He has an almost > > > Zenlike knack for succinctness. That's what enabled him > > > to make so many posts. > > > > I agree that many of them were substantial, but most were > > unnecessary "me too" posts > > I can't recall Lawson's *ever* making a "me too" post. > I think that was one of the comments you made that > really bugged him, because it was just off the wall. > > , and despite repeated requests > > from many people to cut back, he couldn't restrain himself. > > He felt that his posts were unappreciated, as I > said to start with. Obviously you don't tell > somebody to cut back posts you appreciate.
No? Even your *supporters* were asking you to post less, Judy. And you categorically refused, as did Lawson, as did Shemp. The posting limits were the result.