--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of srijim1 > Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 8:46 AM > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [FairfieldLife] "What we have here.... is a failure to > communicate." > > > > "What we have here.... is a failure to communicate." > > I see your point and you are correct that I was under the impression that I > was > corresponding with forum members currently living in Fairfield and involved > in the > activities of the TM Movement. My initial response was to some guy named > Rick Archer > and the subject of the thread was/and is: Special Broadcast on Maharishi > Channel. If you > read my initial response, you should see that my response was in no way > directed towards > people who had actually left the TM Movement. Quite to the contrary, I > applaud you for > having the good sense to do so. When I read your responses, it was my > assumption that > they were targeted to the thread subject matter as initiated by Mr. Archer. > The purpose of > a subject line in a thread is to keep responses within an overall context in > order to stay on > point. You actually sound like a pretty good guy, so I won't take serious > offense at you > repeatedly calling me an asshole, but I don't mind pointing out that you are > actually the > one responding on the wrong thread with regard to the subject topic and it's > initiation. It's > an honest mistake on both of our parts. I was responding to a thread > initiated by a "true > believer," Rick Archer, > > Hey Nabby, are you paying attention? I've been anointed a "true believer." > Cool! Do I get a crown with that? > > Jim, for the record, many things I post here are forwarded. I post them > because I consider them significant and potential stimulants for discussion. > They don't necessarily reflect my opinions. People who've been around a > while know this, so I don't preface every post with a disclaimer. > > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.21/1265 - Release Date: 2/7/2008 > 11:17 AM > Finally, someone who is actually willing to explain the situation without feeling the need to insult me. Now, was that so difficult to accomplish? Rick, here I thought you were some "true believer" and now it is apparent you are anything but. My apologies. I am obviously in the wrong forum talking to the wrong people. You have your own thing happening here and I'll intrude no further. Good luck to you all.
SriJim
