Just because.

**

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Let's see now... reason for going to India instead of staying
> home...oh I know...
> 
> chillum packed with temple hash!
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Marek Reavis" <reavismarek@>
> wrote:
> >
> > Edg, I like 'form' just as much as the next guy, and see it (as 
you 
> > yourself have noted) as a reflection of what's inside.  I love 
images 
> > of the Gods because each one is a respository in form of some 
> > aspiration of the human psyche that points back towards the self.
> > 
> > Just so the Maharishi memorial for me (or so I would hope it to 
be), 
> > a place for pilgrimage, not because it's any special-er than any 
> > place else, but because for me it'll be a touchstone for the 
years of 
> > my attention on Maharishi and what I gained through that 
> > association.  Like swishing around in the hot water to feel the 
heat 
> > that's already there.
> > 
> > There's no ultimate value for going anywhere or doing anything 
except 
> > the perceived gain to the individual.  I enjoy the anticipation 
of a 
> > pilgimage around many of the sacred sites of India associated 
with 
> > the history of Maharishi and Guru Dev just because.  No other 
reason.
> > 
> > Marek
> > 
> > **
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung <no_reply@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Marek,
> > > 
> > > What spiritual reason is there for visiting the site?  Just 
close 
> > your
> > > eyes, and you're as close to Maharishi as anyone ever was....and
> > > symbols being only as valuable as the projection upon them, you 
> > could
> > > do that from the comfort of home with simply imagining the 
visit.
> > > 
> > > I'm betting you have something to teach me, but I sure don't 
get it.
> > > 
> > > Edg
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Marek Reavis" 
<reavismarek@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Yes, N.1008; I look forward to being able to visit that site 
and 
> > pay 
> > > > my respects someday in the future.  He was a fine man with a 
long 
> > > > life and a tremendous influence on many people.  He certainly 
> > gave my 
> > > > life some wonderful top spin and I'm entirely grateful.
> > > > 
> > > > **
> > > > 
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 
<no_reply@> 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Marek Reavis" 
> > > > > <reavismarek@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Comment below:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > **
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" 
> > > > > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Speaking of the commentary....why couldn't they shutup
> > > > > > > > at least for one second? It was as if they felt they
> > > > > > > > had to fill every moment with yak-yak.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > It reminded me of any puja with Indians. As soon as the 
> > pundit 
> > > > > > starts
> > > > > > > chanting the whole audience starts chatting away and 
> > ignoring 
> > > > the
> > > > > > > priest!  One of my favorite babbles from him was when 
he 
> > would 
> > > > > > claim
> > > > > > > that there were no words to express...and then keep 
talking!
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > It also reflects the reality of the crowd.  Most 
Indians 
> > would 
> > > > > not
> > > > > > > actually meditate but touching Maharishi's foot or 
getting 
> > the 
> > > > > > magical
> > > > > > > "darshon" at his cremation can draw a crowd.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Aside from the incessant talking I really enjoyed how 
> > natural a 
> > > > > > public
> > > > > > > cremation seemed.  It seems like one step more 
acceptance 
> > of 
> > > > > death 
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > I like it better than throwing someone in the ground. 
It 
> > seems 
> > > > > more
> > > > > > > complete.  I bailed around 2:30 Eastern time because I 
read 
> > it 
> > > > > can
> > > > > > > burn for up to 6 hours!  
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > I guess in the end India was proud of its famous son.  
I 
> > think
> > > > > > > Maharishi would have loved the whole show.  It was an 
> > amazing 
> > > > > step 
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > > technology to be able to sit in my home and witness 
such an 
> > > > > > event.  I
> > > > > > > appreciate that it was available as well as the 
viewing.  I 
> > > > > think 
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > movement got this one right.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > **snip to end**
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Agree with you, Curtis, particularly the last point.  It 
> > > > surprised 
> > > > > > me how open and up front the TMO was about Maharishi's 
death 
> > and 
> > > > > the 
> > > > > > final rites.  I expected that Maharishi's passing would 
have 
> > been 
> > > > > > hushed up a la L.Ron Hubbard's never ending voyage and, 
> > except 
> > > > for 
> > > > > a 
> > > > > > handful of insiders, no one would have known how or when 
he 
> > > > > actually 
> > > > > > left the stage.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I was happy to watch the whole thing.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Yes, very nice. That TV commentor did a marvelous job on 
> > commenting 
> > > > > on Maharishis life in reviving the Vedas even though he was 
not 
> > an 
> > > > > insider. Reportedly a marble memorian will be built at that 
> > exact 
> > > > > spot. It's nice that we will have a place of pilgrimage.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to