--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, satvadude108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You ain't seen nuthin yet dude. Wait till she starts her > race baiting, it gets really interesting then. She just > don't like the "uppity" ones. Best to put on a garland of > garlic and read other posts. I've been wanting to ask > TurquoiseB if it is possible that he was a Jesuit exorcist > before the Tibetan thang. I bet those dudes could wield > a wooden stake.
They were better with fires. :-) And it was the Dominicans who tended to burn heretics, not the Jesuits so much. But in all seriousness, if there were a way to actually determine whether it was true or not, my money would be on Judy having spent several lifetimes as an Inquisitor, rather than a victim of their...uh...holy services. Look at the tactics. Feeling threatened by anyone who disputes the holy dogma, whether it be the Book Of Maharishi or the Book Of Hillary. An intense need to *discredit* the heretic in the eyes of others. The need to get them to "confess their sins." The tactics of language used. It's all straight out of Bernardo Gui's 1323 Practica Inquisitionis Heretice Pravitatis (Conduct of the Inquisition into Heretical Wickedness). If you want a slap-your-forehead moment of realization, scour the Web and read a few excerpts from it, and then compare the techniques being taught to those regularly practiced by one Judith Stein. Here's one: "Indeed it is all too difficult to get the heretics to reveal themselves when they hide their errors, instead of frankly confessing them, or when reliable and adequate testimony against them is lacking. In such a case all kinds of problems confront the Inquisitor... Laymen of staunch faith find it a scandalous matter if an inquisitorial trial, once begun, is abandoned for some kind of lack of method. When they see the learned thus deceived by common and vile persons, the faith of the Faithful is to some degree weakened; for they believe that we have at our disposal luminous and certain arguments that cannot be refuted, and that they expect us to be able to vanquish [the heretics] in such a way that even a layman can clearly follow the arguments." Here's another, a "dialogue" dreamed up in his head by a madman, and proposed to others as an example of how one embarrasses and destroys a heretic with language. Read through it and see if it doesn't sound a tad familiar: http://www.cathar.info/121207_guiwaldensians.htm I suspect such dialogues go through Judy's head pretty much every moment that she is unable to post on Fairfield Life. That's why she has so many of them "stored up" when she reappears.
