--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip> > Oh, I think everyone understands perfectly, > Jude. What's "really crucial" to you is > bashing Barry. This post marks the 100th > such bash since I said I wasn't going to > be sucked into any more of your arguments > again. And I haven't been.
Sez Barry, getting sucked in again, as he has been repeatedly since he claimed he wasn't going to be. (Does he really *count* the number of times I've bashed him?? That's really pretty amazing.) But see, the bash here wasn't really anything you *could* have argued with: > > Edg is a putz, and I really don't want to spend > > any more of my Sunday thinking about him, but I > > just had to comment on the above. > > Sez Barry, who then proceeds to lecture Edg on his > inability to control himself. When you try to bash somebody for something you openly admit to just having done yourself, you invite mockery, and you leave yourself with no argument. > You, on the other hand, have gone more than > a little crazy, desperately scheming to find > some comment -- anything -- that will get me > to argue with you again. That wasn't my intention, as noted. But what you're doing now just reinforces my original point as to your inability to control yourself, and your consequent hypocrisy in bashing Edg for the same purported lack. Plus which, there's no need for me to "desperately scheme" to find things to bash you about. I mean, you just handed me one! (I'm not sure "desperately scheme to find" even makes sense semantically, but we'll let that go for now.) You've been getting off easy the last couple of weeks because I've been more interested in political discussions with folks who at least know a *little* about what's going on (your ignorance on that score is just too massive to bother with). <snip> > I did notice that you *still* haven't man- > aged to post anything positive, however. What is this preoccupation with positivity, Barry? Seems as though it's some weird hangover from your TM TB days. It isn't one I share, sorry. Just out of curiosity, though, what do you think is the proper balance? I ask because, of the 14 posts you've made so far this posting period, 13 have been negative. What ratio should one strive for, would you say? > How many months is it now that that's been > going on? The only week in which I've made only negative posts was last week, actually. I think Tom's got a good point...if you > cannot help but come back from several > "days off" from FFL *still* full of anger > and bitterness and old grudges, what DO you > dream about? Actually, how I feel when I come back depends entirely on what I find here when I do. (What any of it has to do with dreams, I'm not sure.) > > Could it be...SATAN? :-) >
