--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > [...] > > > > > Finally, after her campaign had indicated they understood > > > the issue with the assassination reference, she ONLY > > > apologized for evoking the Kennedy *NAME*. And later, I > > > understand, she got all "wide-eyed" when someone explicitly > > > asked her about that, and she claimed she had never even > > > considered the possible implications of it before that > > > particular moment when she was asked the question. > > > > OF COURSE SHE DIDN'T. You have to be DERANGED > > to think that's what she intended to communicate. > > > > There's just no other word for it. > > Everyone in the world save you and her is deranged, eh?
No. Robert Kennedy, Jr., RFK's son, isn't deranged. The newspaper editor who conducted the interview isn't deranged. David Axelrod, Obama's campaign manager, isn't deranged. Andrew Sullivan, of all people, isn't deranged (at least not about this). Lots of others aren't deranged. Reasonable people, in general, aren't deranged.
