--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> > wrote: > <snip> > > > > So far this week, she has chosen to praise > > > > the person who is history and no longer a > > > > part of the Presidential campaign in 17 of > > > > her 35 posts. She has dumped on Obama and > > > > demonized him in 10 of them. > > > > > > I'm curious, Barry, what method do you use to keep > > > such careful track of the number of my posts and > > > their content? Is it a spreadsheet, or some program > > > you've written yourself? Have you set up the software > > > so that it automatically detects, for instance, > > > whether a post is pro-Hillary, or is that something > > > you have to decide and then tell the software? > > > > Clearly, you have forgotten The Judy Stein > > Psychic Abilities Contest. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/179221 : > > > > During this posting week, in how many posts will > > Judy Stein do the following: > > 1. Praise Hillary Clinton? -- 11111 11111 11111 11111 > > 2. Bash Barack Obama? -- 11111 11111 > > 3. Bash Turq? -- 11111 11 > > 4. Bash Vaj? -- > > 5. Bash Marek? -- 111 > > 6. Bash Sal? -- 11111 11 > > 7. Bash TM? -- > > > > Quite a few people have replied via email with > > their "seeings," so I needed to keep track so > > I can get back in touch with them with how they > > did against the week's total posts. > > BZZZZZZZT. Wrong again! You've been keeping careful > track of my posts for a very long time. > > You're really off your game this week, Barry.
No, I stopped counting your posts the week after you went over the limit and then claimed you hadn't. Then, when it became obvious that you *had* gone over the limit, you refused to admit that you had, and *then* blamed the thing you refused to admit to having done on the Yahoo Search engine. :-) I figured that after that you'd be too embarrassed to go over the limit any more, so I stopped bothering to count your posts. Counting some of the *content* this week is a new thing, a way of trying to get you to see your own trends and habit patterns, since you are clearly incapable of seeing them on your own. You came up with an excuse for why you've praised "she's history" Hillary Clinton so compulsively this week. But why exactly is it that you found the need to bash Obama so many times? Aren't you the person who has been praising Hillary for putting the past behind her and supporting him now that he's the nominee, and the person who praises that as a good thing, a shining example of someone (Hillary) who *cares* about the Democratic Party and the nation? What then is *your* excuse for continuing to bash him? Don't you want the Democrats to win? Now that you've brought it up, and revealed how touchy you are about it having *been* brought up, I may *continue* to count the number of times you bash Obama between now and the election. Then we can compare your score to your heroine Hillary's score and see which of you is the better Democrat. :-) Speaking of having brought things up, I just checked using the Yahoo Search engine, and it appears that you "jumped the gun" this week. You weren't able to wait until midnight Fair- field time to 1) demonstrate your inability to click on a link, and then 2) bash Rep. Rob Andrews for blowing the whistle on the Clinton campaign that you made two posts before the new "posting week" started. That technically puts you two posts over the limit for last week. Since you'll undoubtedly "post out" before today is over, I assume that you will deduct those two extra posts from this week's count and stop at 48? Right? :-)
